2013
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2013.11777299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Writing Habits of Tomorrow's Students: Technology and College Readiness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper extends what has already been found in the literature whereas major skill deficiencies of students entering higher education are consistently found Dixon, 2017;Mishra et al, 2015;Hanson et al, 2011;Relles & Tierney, 2013) through an examination of five years of student performance on an international assessment of digital and information literacy. Further, student perception surveys were included in this study and, similar to what has been reported by ECAR (Dahlstrom, Walker, & Dzuiban, 2014), students expressed that they wished they had come to college more prepared to use computer software applications and that their high school had not adequately prepared them for use of technology in higher education.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper extends what has already been found in the literature whereas major skill deficiencies of students entering higher education are consistently found Dixon, 2017;Mishra et al, 2015;Hanson et al, 2011;Relles & Tierney, 2013) through an examination of five years of student performance on an international assessment of digital and information literacy. Further, student perception surveys were included in this study and, similar to what has been reported by ECAR (Dahlstrom, Walker, & Dzuiban, 2014), students expressed that they wished they had come to college more prepared to use computer software applications and that their high school had not adequately prepared them for use of technology in higher education.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These findings are further supported with Table 6 that considers weighted IC 3 exam scores for 2690 entering freshmen with a mean score of 566.34 out of 1,000 observed. Holistically, all of this information is considered positive confirmation that students do not come to college with the technology skills needed for success and are consistent with what has been reported by Hanson et al (2011), Marakas, Johnson, andClay (2007), Mishra et al (2015), and Nataraj (2014) as well as in the literature focusing on the technological readiness of students attending minority institutions, such as Buzzetto-Hollywood et al (2017), Buzzetto-More and SweatGuy (2007), Relles and Tierney (2013), and Zielezinski, (2017). This hypothesis was measured by considering agreement to the statement "It is important for college students to take computing courses."…”
Section: H1-computer Applications Courses Are Effective At Building Tsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…From an integrative perspective, the Metasociocognitive Model of Written Composition [33,34] conceptualises writing as a metacognitive interaction of cognitive and sociocultural factors, which are deployed by the action of motivational factors. This interaction is highlighted in the literature on the subject (see for example: [35][36][37][38][39]. Therefore, the importance of checking the level of students' awareness of their writing process globally [40,41] is emphasised, in order to guide learning towards new levels of writing conceptualisation, that give efficiency to written communication.…”
Section: Writing Metacognition At Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, students who have extended experiences with writing on computers and who are used to utilizing online dictionaries are poised to perform better on timed NAEP writing tests than students who have not had much experience writing on a computer. Relles and Tierney, (2013) found that administering writing tests on computers dramatically disadvantages poor and minority children who may lack access to the latest technological tools. They write:…”
Section: New Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%