2007
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1010223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Trust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This well‐known indicator of social trust has been criticized on at least two grounds: that it measures trustworthiness rather than actual “behavioral” trust (Glaeser, Laibson, Scheinkman, & Soutter, ) and that it is underspecified in the sense that it is unclear for the respondent whom one is supposed to trust with respect to what (Hardin, ; Nannestad, ). With regard to the former criticism, the results by Glaeser et al () have been refuted on the grounds of the specific sample studied, specifically the homogeneity of participants and their mutual knowledge about each other, and the social trust measure has subsequently been shown to correlate with actual trusting behavior in more diverse and less information‐rich samples (Sapienza, Toldra, & Zingales, ). This suggests that the standard survey question captures trust in anonymous others and thus corresponds with how social trust is conceptualized in this study.…”
Section: Data and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This well‐known indicator of social trust has been criticized on at least two grounds: that it measures trustworthiness rather than actual “behavioral” trust (Glaeser, Laibson, Scheinkman, & Soutter, ) and that it is underspecified in the sense that it is unclear for the respondent whom one is supposed to trust with respect to what (Hardin, ; Nannestad, ). With regard to the former criticism, the results by Glaeser et al () have been refuted on the grounds of the specific sample studied, specifically the homogeneity of participants and their mutual knowledge about each other, and the social trust measure has subsequently been shown to correlate with actual trusting behavior in more diverse and less information‐rich samples (Sapienza, Toldra, & Zingales, ). This suggests that the standard survey question captures trust in anonymous others and thus corresponds with how social trust is conceptualized in this study.…”
Section: Data and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%