1999
DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/8/4/301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding understanding: a model for the public learning of radioactivity

Abstract: While much of the work in the public understanding of science has focused on the public's appreciation of science and their familiarity with key scientific concepts, understanding the processes involved in learning science has largely been ignored. This article documents a study of how particular members of the public learn about radiation and radioactivity, and proposes a model to describe their learning—the Informal Conceptual Change Model [ICCM]. ICCM is a multidimensional framework that incorporates three … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings are reported by Boyes and Stanisstreet (1994) The close presence of the school source was a potential threat that the pre-service teachers often defused by trusting the interviewer's safe practice. Similar findings have been reported for the general public by Alsop (1999) and Macgill (1987). Jenkins (2003) has identified trust in others as an emotionally satisfying way to deal with risk when science knowledge is lacking.…”
Section: It Is a Lot Higher Than The Background (The Gm Counts From Tsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similar findings are reported by Boyes and Stanisstreet (1994) The close presence of the school source was a potential threat that the pre-service teachers often defused by trusting the interviewer's safe practice. Similar findings have been reported for the general public by Alsop (1999) and Macgill (1987). Jenkins (2003) has identified trust in others as an emotionally satisfying way to deal with risk when science knowledge is lacking.…”
Section: It Is a Lot Higher Than The Background (The Gm Counts From Tsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…I followed this with studies of living and learning with the science of radon set within a picturesque Somerset village (Alsop 1999), and a collaborative curriculum project in Brazil responding to a tragic nuclear accident involving youth and an abandoned radiotherapy machine (see Watts et al 1997).…”
Section: Angles Of Arrivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 For example, Gregory and Miller report the case where nuclear workers would rather trust their colleagues to provide a safe work environment than attempt to understand the health risks of alpha, beta and gamma radiation themselves. 16 Understanding is not a binary condition, something that you either have or you don't have, 17 but rather a developing comprehension of both the meaning and implications of some knowledge, action or process based on appropriate commonly accepted principles. For scientific understanding, the appropriate commonly accepted principles would be science's theories, laws, and processes identified in the science section together with some appreciation of their ramifications.…”
Section: Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critics have pointed out that surveys, which identify the public as being deficient in scientific knowledge, may not adequately address the true complexity of the issue. 50 For example, do the polls indicate widespread scientific illiteracy or do they really just capture the public's ambivalence to science (or at least to the aspects of science that were assessed)? Is it realistic to test the public's knowledge of scientific facts?…”
Section: Science and Society: Where Does Science Communication Fit In?mentioning
confidence: 99%