Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Hybrid electric and electric vehicles have represented a small portion of the automotive market for many years and mainly use current lubricants, typically automatic transmission fluids (ATFs). However, regulatory compliance to limit greenhouse gases and increased consumer demand have resulted in a rapid global transition to electrified vehicles. This has prompted the need for new advances in vehicle technology to improve efficiency and thereby increase range. Enabling and optimizing such advances requires a new generation of driveline lubricants. Incorporating an electric motor in a transmission or axle, where the motor is exposed to the gear box lubricant, creates new challenges that focus attention on lubricant characteristics that were previously not differentiating features, for example, electrical and thermal properties. Additionally, lubricants must now also be compatible with the constituents used in electric motors which include new polymeric materials and, in some cases, exposed copper. Compatibility tests of these polymers vary within the industry and the risk of copper corrosion in these applications is not always properly assessed by current specification tests. In this paper we will begin with a brief history of electric vehicles, highlight how driveline lubricants, specifically ATFs, have evolved over the years to meet new hardware requirements and then describe the performance requirements expected of lubricants specifically designed for vehicles with electric drive units (EDUs). Our primary goal, however, is to summarize the recent literature that illustrates the changing importance of various lubricant performance properties, new proposed test methods and offer some insight into future e-lubricant evolution.
Hybrid electric and electric vehicles have represented a small portion of the automotive market for many years and mainly use current lubricants, typically automatic transmission fluids (ATFs). However, regulatory compliance to limit greenhouse gases and increased consumer demand have resulted in a rapid global transition to electrified vehicles. This has prompted the need for new advances in vehicle technology to improve efficiency and thereby increase range. Enabling and optimizing such advances requires a new generation of driveline lubricants. Incorporating an electric motor in a transmission or axle, where the motor is exposed to the gear box lubricant, creates new challenges that focus attention on lubricant characteristics that were previously not differentiating features, for example, electrical and thermal properties. Additionally, lubricants must now also be compatible with the constituents used in electric motors which include new polymeric materials and, in some cases, exposed copper. Compatibility tests of these polymers vary within the industry and the risk of copper corrosion in these applications is not always properly assessed by current specification tests. In this paper we will begin with a brief history of electric vehicles, highlight how driveline lubricants, specifically ATFs, have evolved over the years to meet new hardware requirements and then describe the performance requirements expected of lubricants specifically designed for vehicles with electric drive units (EDUs). Our primary goal, however, is to summarize the recent literature that illustrates the changing importance of various lubricant performance properties, new proposed test methods and offer some insight into future e-lubricant evolution.
This study aims to assess the compatibility of various e-thermal fluids for immersion cooling in battery electric vehicles through a copper wire resistance corrosion test. The tested fluids include a polyalphaolefin, diester, mineral oil API G-III, transformer oil, and a fully formulated dielectric coolant. The test was conducted at 130 °C for 336 h, and the resistance of the copper wires was monitored in vapor and oil phases. By comparing the resistance variation and analyzing portions of the wires through scanning electron microscopy, it was found that the vapor phase of PAO and diester in one of the tests exhibited significant corrosion, while the dielectric coolant showed minimal corrosive effects, implying better compatibility. These results provide insights into the corrosion behavior and compatibility of the fluids with copper, which are essential for selecting suitable dielectric fluids for immersion cooling applications in electric vehicles.
<div>The ASTM D130 was first issued in 1922 as a tentative standard for the detection of corrosive sulfur in gasoline. A clean copper strip was immersed in a sample of gasoline for three hours at 50°C with any corrosion or discoloration taken to indicate the presence of corrosive sulfur. Since that time, the method has undergone many revisions and has been applied to many petroleum products. Today, the ASTM D130 standard is the leading method used to determine the corrosiveness of various fuels, lubricants, and other hydrocarbon-based solutions to copper. The end-of-test strips are ranked using the ASTM Copper Strip Corrosion Standard Adjunct, a colored reproduction of copper strips characteristic of various degrees of sulfur-induced tarnish and corrosion, first introduced in 1954. This pragmatic approach to assessing potential corrosion concerns with copper hardware has served various industries well for a century.</div> <div>Driveline lubricants have always been required to protect hardware, and transmission fluid specifications have always included a version of the copper corrosion strip test to assure this. In conventional transmissions, copper and its alloys are present in the form of mechanical parts such as bushings, bearings, and washers. Corrosion of these parts, while detrimental, does not typically result in immediate failure. However, the incorporation of electronics and electric motors has resulted in new failure modes which can have immediate and devastating consequences. Designing a lubricant to protect new electrified hardware requires an understanding of corrosion that occurs under actual operating temperatures, as well as potential damage from corrosion products. While the ASTM D130 provides general insight regarding the susceptibility of the hardware to corrode, the information is typically gleaned at elevated temperatures, and no information is gathered about the impact of corrosion products. The ASTM D130 is simply not sufficiently specific to adequately assess the risk of these new failure modes that may occur within electric drive units (EDUs). Newer methods, in particular, the wire corrosion test (WCT) and conductive deposit test (CDT), have been created to fill these gaps.</div> <div>In this article, we provide the history of the creation and evolution of the ASTM D130 standard, which is important in understanding both its significance and limitations. We then assess the corrosion characteristics of five lubricants using both the ASTM D130 strip method and the WCT method. We contrast these results, which demonstrate the greater understanding gleaned from the WCT. We then assess the five lubricants with the CDT, which provides insight into whether the corrosion products might endanger the system. We conclude that both the WCT and CDT are needed to provide a holistic understanding of corrosion in electrified hardware necessary to minimize the risk of corrosion-related failure modes. We anticipate that the WCT and CDT will establish themselves in original equipment manufacturer (OEM) specifications over the next decade and will provide a useful assurance of lubricant performance in corrosion, especially for hybrid (HEVs) and electric vehicles (EVs).</div>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.