2014
DOI: 10.1177/0959680114527880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding varieties of flexibility and security in multinationals: Product markets, institutional variation and local bargaining

Abstract: Most studies of flexicurity have focused on formal institutions within distinctive national labour market systems. However, the level and types of flexibility and security in a national labour market are to an important extent influenced by company-level processes, relationships and policies; thus a micro-perspective should be integrated into the study of flexibility and security. This article advances understanding of the influences of decentralized rule-making and its links with the macro level by drawing on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the empirical results of Macher, Mayo and Schiffer () which suggest that MNFs exert some influence on government decisions (at the executive, legislative, ministerial and regulatory agency levels), even after controlling for the influence of a set of country‐, industry‐ and firm‐level characteristics, including firm size. This also confirms the managerial practices in the Belgian subsidiaries documented by Pulignano and Keune (): ‘the threat to relocate production again led local unions to negotiate increased flexibility, allegedly necessary to keep the plant competitive and avoid job losses’. This enables foreign multinationals to transfer their workforce management practices to their subsidiaries.…”
Section: Econometric Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with the empirical results of Macher, Mayo and Schiffer () which suggest that MNFs exert some influence on government decisions (at the executive, legislative, ministerial and regulatory agency levels), even after controlling for the influence of a set of country‐, industry‐ and firm‐level characteristics, including firm size. This also confirms the managerial practices in the Belgian subsidiaries documented by Pulignano and Keune (): ‘the threat to relocate production again led local unions to negotiate increased flexibility, allegedly necessary to keep the plant competitive and avoid job losses’. This enables foreign multinationals to transfer their workforce management practices to their subsidiaries.…”
Section: Econometric Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…By contrast, for a 200‐employee firm, adjustment costs for clerical workers are around half as much for MNFs as for domestic firms. In line with the findings of Pulignano and Keune (), the difference may be the result of stronger bargaining power associated with the potential threat of shifting production abroad, going even as far as plant or firm closure. Domestic firms and MNFs are unequal in this respect.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This article demonstrates the value of incorporating workplace dynamics in national‐level accounts of labour market dualisation, thereby further developing the contribution of the industrial relations literature to political economy debates (e.g. Doerflinger and Pulignano, ; Pulignano and Keune, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Recent research has gone beyond the national level to highlight sector-and company-level governance mechanisms that also influence the definition of flexible and secure employment (Pulignano and Keune 2015). This research argues that the effectiveness of any flexicurity strategy followed by national governments depends on institutional variation at the sector-and company-level (Crouch and Keune 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%