2006
DOI: 10.1177/0038022920060106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Volunteering: The Case of Khasi-Jaintia Society in Meghalaya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some literature on kinship and marriage among the Khasi people is available (Bareh 1997;Barooah 2007;Chowdhury 1996;Mawrie 1981;Nongkynrih 2002), to our knowledge there is no published study on sexuality. The data for this study come from a university in Shillong, the capital of Meghalaya, where the majority of students are indigenous peoples from different tribes of the Northeast India.…”
Section: S353mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although some literature on kinship and marriage among the Khasi people is available (Bareh 1997;Barooah 2007;Chowdhury 1996;Mawrie 1981;Nongkynrih 2002), to our knowledge there is no published study on sexuality. The data for this study come from a university in Shillong, the capital of Meghalaya, where the majority of students are indigenous peoples from different tribes of the Northeast India.…”
Section: S353mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protestant churches also punish co-habiting couples by suspending them from church membership for half a year to allow them to 'repent of their sins' (Vincent 1978) and in the Catholic church such couples are not permitted to receive Communion until they have confessed their 'sins' and agree to confirm their marriage in the Catholic church (Mukhim 2007). In Khasi culture, perhaps the only taboo (ka sang) in relation to sexuality is the prohibition of marrying or having a sexual relationship with someone from the same kur (clan), especially the maternal clan (Dutta 1982;Gurdon 2002;Nongkynrih 2002). Otherwise the community accepts courtship, 'love marriage' and freedom to choose one's own spouse (Bareh 1997;Natarajan 1977).…”
Section: Sin and Guiltmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, when prayer is offered for the welfare of family, clan or village, then the divine is addressed as Ka Blei (with feminine gender). But when prayer is offered for raid or hima (group of villages) then the divine is addressed as U Blei (with masculine gender; Nongkynrih, 2002). This not only defies the feminine–masculine or matriarchy–patriarchy dichotomy but also puts the female at a respectable if not pre-eminent position vis-à-vis the male.…”
Section: The Dialectic Of Purush Jat and Women’s Security In South Asiamentioning
confidence: 99%