2003
DOI: 10.1086/499734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understandings, Beliefs, and Reported Decision Making of First-Year Teachers from Different Reading Teacher Preparation Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whitehead 2016). For example, teachers who find themselves in professional settings heavily controlled by external stakeholders or external directives may default to classroom practices that have become routinized and habitual, utilizing metacognition in far fewer instances (Maloch et al 2003;Valli and Buese 2007). Conversely, teachers who are in less constrained, non-routinized situations must make more decisions and therefore may require a higher degree of metacognition.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Teacher Metacognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whitehead 2016). For example, teachers who find themselves in professional settings heavily controlled by external stakeholders or external directives may default to classroom practices that have become routinized and habitual, utilizing metacognition in far fewer instances (Maloch et al 2003;Valli and Buese 2007). Conversely, teachers who are in less constrained, non-routinized situations must make more decisions and therefore may require a higher degree of metacognition.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Teacher Metacognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, researchers found that mastery experiences in the domain of reading did impact pre-service teachers' content knowledge. In fact, preservice teachers who were exposed to real world mastery experiences, such as reading tutoring, were more likely to have a higher ability to respond to individual student needs (Maloch et al 2003;Worthy and Prater 1998) and put theory they were learning at their university into practice (Fang and Ashley 2004). Likewise, pre-service teachers who tutored were reflective and analytical about teaching and were able to create questions that could define future learning (Hedrick et al 2000).…”
Section: Lack Of Change or Negative Change In Pre-service Teacher Effmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Μελέτες, ωστόσο, καταδεικνύουν ότι οι πεποιθήσεις διδακτικής αποτελεσματικότητας για αυτή είναι σημαντικές και μπορούν να συνεισφέρουν θετικά στην αναγνωστική ικανότητα και τα αναγνωστικά κίνητρα των μαθητών (Guo et al, 2010;Guo et al, 2013;Szabo & Mokhtari, 2004). Εκπαιδευτικοί με ισχυρή αίσθηση αποτελεσματικότητας για την αναγνωστική διδασκαλία είναι ανοικτοί σε νέες ιδέες και είναι προθυμότεροι να πειραματιστούν με καινοτόμες αναγνωστικές μεθόδους για να ανταποκριθούν καλύτερα στις ατομικές εκπαιδευτικές ανάγκες των μαθητών τους (Maloch, Flint, & Eldridge, 2003;Szabo & Mokhtari, 2004) και να επιμείνουν όταν οι μαθητές τους αντιμετωπίζουν δυσκολίες (Allinder, 1994). Επίσης, είναι σίγουροι για τη διδακτική τους ικανότητα, όπως επίσης και για τις δυνατότητές τους να επιφέρουν θετικές αλλαγές στην αναγνωστική συμπεριφορά των μαθητών τους μέσω των διδακτικών τους παρεμβάσεων.…”
Section: εισαγωγήunclassified