2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01357.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understorey plant community structure in lower montane and subalpine forests, Grand Canyon National Park, USA

Abstract: Aim Our objectives were to compare understorey plant community structure among forest types, and to test hypotheses relating understorey community structure within lower montane and subalpine forests to fire history, forest structure, fuel loads and topography.Location Forests on the North Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA.Methods We measured understorey (< 1.4 m) plant community structure in 0.1-ha plots. We examined differences in univariate response variables among forest types, used permutati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a condition also could have been resulted from little canopy opening that affecting undergrowth and regeneration. According to Laughlin et al (2005) and Giliba et al ( 2011),one of the factors associated with this difference in population structure could be anthropogenic activities. Similarly, frequent human interference could lead in disturbing the ecosystem, community, or population structure and changes resources availability (Chapman et al 1997;Pickett and White 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a condition also could have been resulted from little canopy opening that affecting undergrowth and regeneration. According to Laughlin et al (2005) and Giliba et al ( 2011),one of the factors associated with this difference in population structure could be anthropogenic activities. Similarly, frequent human interference could lead in disturbing the ecosystem, community, or population structure and changes resources availability (Chapman et al 1997;Pickett and White 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low woody species diversity obtained from the production zone could be due to the excessive wood harvesting practice exhibited by the local community; as evidenced we visualized charcoal burning activities carried out in this zone (personal observation). Laughlin et al (2005)studied the effect of various types of disturbance on species diversity and had investigated their negative implication on species diversity. The higher evenness index value obtained from the strict nature zone and buffer zone indicated an even distribution of species in this management zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bakker). A separate ISA was conducted for each year, and results were combined using meta-analytical techniques (Bakker 2005). For a given species in a given group, the IVs from every year, that it occurred, were averaged to yield a mean IV, and the associated P-values were combined using a weighted Z-transform (Whitlock 2005).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very few sites, such as the Powell Plateau in the Grand Canyon and some regions of northern Mexico, may have experienced so little change in land use and fire regimes that contemporary measurements are possible (Fulé et al 2005). Some of the most detailed insights about the structure and function of old-growth forests come from intensive experiments that have reestablished historic forest structure.…”
Section: Determining the Historic Structure And Function Of Old-growtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship between the density of trees and understory diversity is further influenced by the number of years between fires (the fire return interval). For example, a ponderosa pine forest on the Kaibab Plateau that burned in the past 10 years might have 35 species in the understory, compared with 28 species after 70 years without a fire, and 22 species after 120 years without a fire (Laughlin et al 2005).…”
Section: Productivity Hydrology and Nutrient Cyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%