2017
DOI: 10.1121/1.5006141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underwater acoustic channel characteristics and communication performance at 85 kHz

Abstract: A high frequency acoustic experiment was conducted in the northern portion of the Gulf of Mexico in August 2016 to examine the operating range, data rates, and performance of acoustic communication systems at the carrier frequency of 85 kHz. The received signal-to-noise ratios, channel coherence, and impulse responses were reported between two 85 kHz transducers and a five-element hydrophone array over multiple ranges up to 1500 m. Channel estimation based decision feedback equalizers (DFEs) were applied to pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The UAC coherence time is usually in the order of hundreds of milliseconds for practical system designs for horizontal transmission scenarios [13]. Therefore, for a practical vertical UAC of similar range, the coherence time is expected to be higher because the transmission is less affected by surface and seabed reflections [19]. If we consider an RMS Doppler spread of 1 Hz, the channel coherence time can be considered to be around 100 ms, which already characterises a dynamic UAC.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UAC coherence time is usually in the order of hundreds of milliseconds for practical system designs for horizontal transmission scenarios [13]. Therefore, for a practical vertical UAC of similar range, the coherence time is expected to be higher because the transmission is less affected by surface and seabed reflections [19]. If we consider an RMS Doppler spread of 1 Hz, the channel coherence time can be considered to be around 100 ms, which already characterises a dynamic UAC.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the model defined in (26), a number of approaches can be measured the optimal filter coefficients (f m , b m , and r m,k ). In this paper, we adopt the linear minimum mean square error method to calculate the filter coefficients.…”
Section: Channel Estimation Based Decision Feedback Equalization With Interference Cancellationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally for radio WSNs, the reliability of radio communication channels is considered better than that of underwater acoustic channels in UWANs [52] due to multiple acoustic propagation paths and plentiful acoustic interference sources in oceans, such as marine animals (e.g., whales and even shrimps), rains, ships and even bubbles besides other acoustic devices [20]. For example, the measured bit error rate is 4 × 10 −3 for a data rate of 34 kbps over a 1500m-link with 9dB-SNR and 21.25 kHz bandwidth at 85 kHz frequency [53]. Therefore, more bandwidth is needed for reliable transmission in UWANs, resulting in much less bandwidth available for network security.…”
Section: Challenges For Uwans Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%