2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18124318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underwater Acoustic Target Recognition Based on Supervised Feature-Separation Algorithm

Abstract: For the purpose of improving the accuracy of underwater acoustic target recognition with only a small number of labeled data, we proposed a novel recognition method, including 4 steps: pre-processing, pre-training, fine-tuning and recognition. The 4 steps can be explained as follows: (1) Pre-processing with Resonance-based Sparsity Signal Decomposition (RSSD): RSSD was firstly utilized to extract high-resonance components from ship-radiated noise. The high-resonance components contain the major information for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, it is a much less clear problem than supervised learning, and there is no clear error metric. In underwater acoustics, a considerable number of previous sonar application studies have used machine learning for classification purposes, such as target type/state classification (Choi et al, 2019;Fischell and Schmidt, 2015;Ke et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2019) and target and clutter signal classification (Allen et al, 2011;Murphy and Hines, 2014;Young and Hines, 2007). In many of these studies, the properties of the data that were used for learning were recognized beforehand owing to the goals of the studies.…”
Section: Definitions Types and Basic Concepts Of Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it is a much less clear problem than supervised learning, and there is no clear error metric. In underwater acoustics, a considerable number of previous sonar application studies have used machine learning for classification purposes, such as target type/state classification (Choi et al, 2019;Fischell and Schmidt, 2015;Ke et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2019) and target and clutter signal classification (Allen et al, 2011;Murphy and Hines, 2014;Young and Hines, 2007). In many of these studies, the properties of the data that were used for learning were recognized beforehand owing to the goals of the studies.…”
Section: Definitions Types and Basic Concepts Of Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in [15], Cao et al utilized Stacked Autoencoder (SAE) to extract high-level features for ship recognition with short time frequency transform, which provided competitive performance. Ke et al in [16] utilized deep Autoencoder and SVM to classify two classes of underwater acoustic targets. In [17,18], deep belief networks (DBNs) were utilized to the recognition of ship-radiated noise.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, passive SONAR data without classification are relatively abundant. Yang et al (2018) and Ke et al (2018) have conducted studies utilizing unclassified SONAR data for pre-training to increase the efficiency of supervised learning. Yang et al (2018) used the values of the final hidden layer of the competitive deep-belief network (CDBF) (designed by them) as classifier inputs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The competitive layer is placed at the rear of the hidden layer, and training is performed to Fig. 2 The process of underwater acoustic target recognition (Ke et al, 2018). increase the distinction between the clustered classes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation