2011
DOI: 10.3354/meps09425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underwater acoustics for ecosystem-based management: state of the science and proposals for ecosystem indicators

Abstract: Ecosystem-based management (EBM) requires more extensive information than singlespecies management. Active underwater acoustic methods provide a means of collecting a wealth of ecosystem information with high space-time resolution. Worldwide fisheries institutes and agencies are carrying out regular acoustic surveys covering many marine shelf ecosystems, but these data are underutilized. In addition, more and more acoustic data collected by vessels of opportunity are becoming available. To encourage their use … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple frequency scientific echosounders with split-beams and resulting echo-trace analysis (using frequency responses) can provide information on the sizes of animals, thus allowing some distinctions to be made. Despite the fact that the underwater acoustic instruments do not allow species classification (Knudsen and Larsson, 2009), they could be useful to gain information on pelagic and semi-demersal species as well as on zooplankton assemblages (Trenkel et al, 2011; Table 2). The Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) coupled with a software dedicated to soundscape analysis can be used to elaborate collected acoustic files, in order to track the various biological signals, their daily and nightly dynamics and distinguish them from noise pollution.…”
Section: Acoustic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple frequency scientific echosounders with split-beams and resulting echo-trace analysis (using frequency responses) can provide information on the sizes of animals, thus allowing some distinctions to be made. Despite the fact that the underwater acoustic instruments do not allow species classification (Knudsen and Larsson, 2009), they could be useful to gain information on pelagic and semi-demersal species as well as on zooplankton assemblages (Trenkel et al, 2011; Table 2). The Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) coupled with a software dedicated to soundscape analysis can be used to elaborate collected acoustic files, in order to track the various biological signals, their daily and nightly dynamics and distinguish them from noise pollution.…”
Section: Acoustic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As summarized previously (Trenkel et al, 2011), acousticderived abundance indices have long been used in single stock assessments and will remain important under descriptor 3. Fisheries acoustic data could however have applications beyond that: the spatial range, distribution or other measures of spatial occupancy of a species (Woillez et al, 2007) could also be included as important indicators and are readily extracted from acoustic survey data.…”
Section: Acousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to complexities in species identification in acoustic data, biodiversity indicators (MSFD descriptor 1) at species level remain a challenge. However, in the absence of species-specific information, surrogates for species, such as coarser taxonomic groupings, size groups, or groups distinguished by their multi-frequency backscattering could well prove useful (Godø, 2009;Trenkel et al, 2011).…”
Section: Acousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sounds are also fundamental components of freshwater and marine systems (Trenkel et al, 2011;Yan et al, 2010). Water is an excellent medium for sound transmission because it travels about five times faster in water than in air (about 1500 vs. 300m/s) and attenuates less over the same distances in water than in air.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%