Underwater Localization via Wideband Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Using Acoustic Arrays of Arbitrary Shape

Abstract

Underwater sensing and remote telemetry tasks necessitate the accurate geo-location of sensor data series, which often requires underwater acoustic arrays. These are ensembles of hydrophones that can be jointly operated in order to, e.g., direct acoustic energy towards a given direction, or to estimate the direction of arrival of a desired signal. When the available equipment does not provide the required level of accuracy, it may be convenient to merge multiple transceivers into a larger acoustic array, in order to achieve better processing performance. In this paper, we name such a structure an “array of opportunity” to signify the often inevitable sub-optimality of the resulting array design, e.g., a distance between nearest array elements larger than half the shortest acoustic wavelength that the array would receive. The most immediate consequence is that arrays of opportunity may be affected by spatial ambiguity, and may require additional processing to avoid large errors in wideband direction of arrival (DoA) estimation, especially as opposed to narrowband processing. We consider the design of practical algorithms to achieve accurate detections, DoA estimates, and position estimates using wideband arrays of opportunity. For this purpose, we rely jointly on DoA and rough multilateration estimates to eliminate spatial ambiguities arising from the array layout. By means of emulations that realistically reproduce underwater noise and acoustic clutter, we show that our algorithm yields accurate DoA and location estimates, and in some cases it allows arrays of opportunity to outperform properly designed arrays. For example, at a signal-to-noise ratio of –20 dB, a 15-element array of opportunity achieves lower average and median localization error (27 m and 12 m, respectively) than a 30-element array with proper λ / 2 element spacing (33 m and 15 m, respectively). We confirm the good accuracy of our approach via emulation results, and through a proof-of-concept lake experiment, where our algorithm applied to a 10-element array of opportunity achieves a 90th-percentile DoA estimation error of 4 ∘ and a 90th-percentile total location error of 5 m when applied to a real 10-element array of opportunity.

Classification of Underwater Fish Images and Videos via Very Small Convolutional Neural Networks

“…The system is designed to be submerged into the sea, attached to a mooring cable, and includes both acoustic and optical subsystems (see Figure 7). The acoustic system is a sonar designed and built ad hoc starting from the joint operation of multiple sub-elements [39,40]. The optical subsystem includes two camera arrays, one in the top-most section and another in the bottom part of the system, about 15 m apart.…”

A Directional Selective Power Routing Protocol for the Internet of Underwater Things

“…, k. At each power level, the acoustic signal can be correctly received and detected within a range specified by the acoustic modem characteristics and channel equations. All nodes are equipped with on-board arrays of multiple microphones to determine the arrival angle of the received acoustic signal [44].…”

An Underwater Acoustic Network Positioning Method Based on Spatial-Temporal Self-Calibration

“…People have developed many different positioning methods [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ], taking advantage of the feature that acoustic signals can travel long distances in the underwater environment. The main idea of these methods is to obtain distance information from the reference node according to sound propagation characteristics, and then convert the distance information into the underwater node’s position information through signal processing.…”

“…The main idea of these methods is to obtain distance information from the reference node according to sound propagation characteristics, and then convert the distance information into the underwater node’s position information through signal processing. Distance information is usually characterized by the signal strength (SS) [ 3 , 4 ], angle of arrival (AOA) [ 5 , 6 ], time of arrival (TOA) [ 2 ], and time differences of arrival (TDOA) [ 2 ]. In the underwater acoustic environment, the strength of the received signal is not convenient since the propagation loss is difficult to obtain accurately in a time-varying environment.…”