2014 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icspcc.2014.6986287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underwater sound classification based on Gammatone filter bank and Hilbert-Huang transform

Abstract: The variable acoustic environment makes it harder for the application of underwater sound recognition system. However, human auditory system has remarkable ability on dealing with complex acoustic conditions. A robust underwater noise target classification system is expected if this ability can be simulated. Aimed at this purpose, a robust underwater sound classification algorithm which employs Gammatone filter bank and Hilbert-Huang transform is studied in this paper. Gammatone filter bank is used for the sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feature extraction methods, such as the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) (Gabor, 1946), the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) (Mallat, 1989), the Hilbert-Huang transform (Yu et al, 2016), and the limit cycle (Goldobin et al, 2010), have been proven to be simple yet effective in acoustic signal processing (Zeng and Wang, 2014;Liu et al, 2017;Tuncer et al, 2021). These methods mainly focus on time domain features and have succeeded due to the assumption of a homogenous propagation environment, such as air, where the frequency characteristics of received signals remain constant over time (Salomons and Havinga, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature extraction methods, such as the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) (Gabor, 1946), the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) (Mallat, 1989), the Hilbert-Huang transform (Yu et al, 2016), and the limit cycle (Goldobin et al, 2010), have been proven to be simple yet effective in acoustic signal processing (Zeng and Wang, 2014;Liu et al, 2017;Tuncer et al, 2021). These methods mainly focus on time domain features and have succeeded due to the assumption of a homogenous propagation environment, such as air, where the frequency characteristics of received signals remain constant over time (Salomons and Havinga, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many machine learning methods increase the recognition rate while also increasing the complexity of models [6,7]. This will undoubtedly affect the recognition efficiency, and the recognition rate will also be affected by the underwater environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential applications for GAFs include: multiplexers [13], designing rainbow sensors, [14], analyzing seismic signals [15], underwater sound classification [16], cochlear implants [17], and hearing aids [18]. Due to the nature of these applications, any discussion of GAFs must include a discussion of filterbank representations.…”
Section: B Fractional-exponent Generalized Auditory Filters and Filte...mentioning
confidence: 99%