2018
DOI: 10.7755/fb.116.2.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underwater video surveillance of American lobsters (Homarus americanus) to understand saturation levels in lobster traps

Abstract: The views and opinions expressed or implied in this article are those of the author (or authors) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possibility that European lobster catch rates in commercial fisheries are affected by a density-dependent factor is difficult to detect and compensate for routinely; this can distort the relationship between fishing effort and fishing mortality, which strongly influences the possibility of stock collapse when effort is high . These biases warrant further study using a combination of fishery data and fishery-independent survey methods, such as visual surveillance including the use of remote surveillance (Bloom et al, 2019), capture-mark-recapture (Clark, Jury, Goldstein, Langley, & Watson, 2018;Øresland, Oxby, & Oxby, 2018;Skerritt, Fitzsimmons, Polunin, Berney, & Hardy, 2012) or electronic tagging (Lees et al, 2018;Skerritt et al, 2015), as well as supporting studies of the encounter rate and capture process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The possibility that European lobster catch rates in commercial fisheries are affected by a density-dependent factor is difficult to detect and compensate for routinely; this can distort the relationship between fishing effort and fishing mortality, which strongly influences the possibility of stock collapse when effort is high . These biases warrant further study using a combination of fishery data and fishery-independent survey methods, such as visual surveillance including the use of remote surveillance (Bloom et al, 2019), capture-mark-recapture (Clark, Jury, Goldstein, Langley, & Watson, 2018;Øresland, Oxby, & Oxby, 2018;Skerritt, Fitzsimmons, Polunin, Berney, & Hardy, 2012) or electronic tagging (Lees et al, 2018;Skerritt et al, 2015), as well as supporting studies of the encounter rate and capture process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%