Underwater video techniques for observing coastal marine biodiversity: A review of sixty years of publications (1952–2012)

Abstract

Underwater video techniques are increasingly used in marine ecology studies. Technological progress regarding video cameras, sensors (such as sounders), battery life and information storage make these techniques now accessible to a majority of users. However, diver-based underwater visual censuses, and catch and effort data, remain the most commonly used for observing coastal biodiversity and species. In this paper, we review the underwater video techniques that have been developed since the 1950s to investigate and/or monitor coastal biodiversity. Techniques such as remote underwater video, whether baited or not, diver-operated video and towed video are described, along with corresponding applications in the field. We then analyse the complementary of techniques, first from studies comparing video techniques with other observation techniques, whether video-based or not, and second by documenting their respective cost efficiencies. These findings are discussed with respect to current challenges in monitoring and investigating coastal biodiversity. Video should be more often considered and used, either in addition to or as an alternative to diver-based, fishing and acoustic techniques, as it may be particularly suited for monitoring coastal biodiversity in a variety of areas and on larger scales than hitherto and within an ecosystem-based approach to management and conservation. Highlights ► Underwater video is increasingly used in marine ecology. ► Video is less used than catch and underwater visual census. ► Video techniques comprise baited, unbaited, towed and diver-operated techniques. ► Video is a cost-efficient complement or alternative to other observation techniques.

Habitat Connectivity of Fish in Temperate Shallow-Water Seascapes

“…RUV has great potential for studying movements of individuals and connectivity through the use of stereo video cameras. With stereo video, two cameras are mounted on a calibrated frame and then synchronized to record the same object simultaneously (Mallet and Pelletier, 2014). These recordings give the observer highly accurate three-dimensional images, while collecting data on both flora and fauna unobtrusively (Harvey et al, 2003).…”

Coral Reef Fish Detection and Recognition in Underwater Videos by Supervised Machine Learning: Comparison Between Deep Learning and HOG+SVM Methods

“…This quantification requires in situ sampling of the fish community. Measurements based on extraction-fishing give only limited data, and could lead to misinterpretation [1]. Moreover, the use of fishing, even for survey purposes, impacts the studied biodiversity.…”

“…This kind of survey is expensive in both time and money, and results are greatly impacted by divers' experience and fish behavior. Moreover, data acquisition remains limited by the human physical capacities [1].…”

PILOT APPLICATION OF 3D UNDERWATER IMAGING TECHNIQUES FOR MAPPING POSIDONIA OCEANICA (L.) DELILE MEADOWS

“…However, the information provided by acoustic devices is normally gathered in the form of elevation maps, which are useful for providing a rough approximation of the global shape of the area, but are inadequate for detecting more complex structures, (Campos et al, 2014). Underwater 3D imaging by means of still or video cameras can allow a detailed analysis of the temporal evolution of these meadows, but also of the seafloor morphology and integrity, (Mallet et al, 2014). This method was -still up to a few years ago -time consuming and very expensive, but in the last decade 3D imaging technologies have known substantial technical advancements, with lower costs too.…”