2022
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undifferentiated-predominant mixed-type early gastric cancer is more aggressive than pure undifferentiated type: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: BackgroundStudies have shown that differentiated-predominant mixed-type early gastric cancer (EGC) is more aggressive than pure differentiated-type EGC. However, the biological behaviour of undifferentiated-predominant mixed-type (MU) EGC and pure undifferentiated-type (PU) EGC are controversial. This study was conducted to compare the biological behaviour of MU EGC and PU EGC.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted using literature published through PubMed and Embas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treatment methods for GIMTs have been rapidly changing with the development of medical treatment technology in recent years, and there are various methods commonly used for differential diagnosis in clinical practice[ 29 - 35 ]. However, the sensitivity of single tumour markers is low, and there is a certain degree of underdiagnosis; thus, combined detection of tumour markers is necessary for the diagnosis of GIMTs[ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment methods for GIMTs have been rapidly changing with the development of medical treatment technology in recent years, and there are various methods commonly used for differential diagnosis in clinical practice[ 29 - 35 ]. However, the sensitivity of single tumour markers is low, and there is a certain degree of underdiagnosis; thus, combined detection of tumour markers is necessary for the diagnosis of GIMTs[ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional risk factors identified in individual studies include large tumor size (generally >20 mm), ulceration, undifferentiated tumors (including the presence of an undifferentiated component in differentiated-type-predominant mixed-type lesions), and old age [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Regarding lesion differentiation, a meta-analysis incorporating 5644 patients showed that undifferentiated-predominant mixed-type lesions show more aggressive biological behavior compared to pure undifferentiated-type lesions, presenting a significantly higher risk of submucosal invasion (OR 2.19, 95%CI 1.90–2.52) and LNM (OR 2.28, 95%CI 1.72–3.03) even after stratification for depth of tumor invasion [ 32 ].…”
Section: Indications For Endoscopic Resection: Pre-procedural Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed-type EGC is commonly identified during a review of ER specimens rather than in biopsies before ER [ 68 ]. There is some debate regarding the handling of mixed-type EGC, as mixed-type is known to be associated with more aggressive biological behavior than the non-mixed type [ 69 70 71 72 ]. In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, patients with UD-predominant mixed EGC were found to have a significantly higher risk of submucosal invasion and LNM than those with pure UD-EGC [ 70 ].…”
Section: Histological Differences Within Ud-egcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some debate regarding the handling of mixed-type EGC, as mixed-type is known to be associated with more aggressive biological behavior than the non-mixed type [ 69 70 71 72 ]. In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, patients with UD-predominant mixed EGC were found to have a significantly higher risk of submucosal invasion and LNM than those with pure UD-EGC [ 70 ]. Table 3 summarizes the frequency of LNM in the surgical specimens of EGC for UD-predominant mixed EGC and pure UD-EGC.…”
Section: Histological Differences Within Ud-egcmentioning
confidence: 99%