Une coprésence littorale controversée

Clouette, Fabien

doi:10.4000/rac.27278

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The organizations dedicated to marine biodiversity conservation are leveraging these emotions through the media to raise awareness of civil society and to call the attention of the decision makers, in order to move the issue of bycatch further up in the political agenda. The choice of words such as "killing" or "slaughter" to describe fishers' work plays on the emotional relationship with the marine mammal, stronger than the one shared with the fish or the seabird and is questioning the responsibility of the fishers (Clouette, 2022). The NGOs also use statistical surveys from research projects on bycatch in their communication, since data plays a key role in engaging an audience (Desrosières, 2014;Clouette, 2022).…”

Section: Media Science Communication and Activismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The choice of words such as "killing" or "slaughter" to describe fishers' work plays on the emotional relationship with the marine mammal, stronger than the one shared with the fish or the seabird and is questioning the responsibility of the fishers (Clouette, 2022). The NGOs also use statistical surveys from research projects on bycatch in their communication, since data plays a key role in engaging an audience (Desrosières, 2014;Clouette, 2022).…”

Section: Media Science Communication and Activismmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Co-creating Knowledge with Fishers: Challenges and Lessons for Integrating Fishers' Knowledge Contributions into Marine Science in Well-Developed Scientific Advisory Systems

2023

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frontiers is more than just an open access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to realize our grand goals. Frontiers journal seriesThe Frontiers journal series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of openaccess, online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community. At the same time, the Frontiers journal series operates on a revolutionary invention, the tiered publishing system, initially addressing specific communities of scholars, and gradually climbing up to broader public understanding, thus serving the interests of the lay society, too. Dedication to qualityEach Frontiers article is a landmark of the highest quality, thanks to genuinely collaborative interactions between authors and review editors, who include some of the world's best academicians. Research must be certified by peers before entering a stream of knowledge that may eventually reach the public -and shape society; therefore, Frontiers only applies the most rigorous and unbiased reviews. Frontiers revolutionizes research publishing by freely delivering the most outstanding research, evaluated with no bias from both the academic and social point of view. By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new generation. What are Frontiers Research Topics?Frontiers Research Topics are very popular trademarks of the Frontiers journals series: they are collections of at least ten articles, all centered on a particular subject. With their unique mix of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Frontiers Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area.

show abstract

Section: Media Science Communication and Activismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Media Science Communication and Activismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-creating Knowledge with Fishers: Challenges and Lessons for Integrating Fishers' Knowledge Contributions into Marine Science in Well-Developed Scientific Advisory Systems

2023

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Actors' views and values are polarized resulting in different narratives for the "sustainability" of the fishing industry. The beached dolphin bodies become a symbol of the impact of fishing on marine ecosystems, and call into question the interrelationships between humans and nature, and more specifically the industrial exploitation of the ocean (Clouette, 2022). Faced with this question, fishers argue that, in order to satisfy the current national demand for seafood, the corresponding fishing techniques must be maintained, giving the example of fish sole and scampi that cannot be caught with fishing traps.…”

Section: Different Interests and Narratives For The Sustainability Of...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Media Science Communication and Activismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Media Science Communication and Activismmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Integrating fishers’ knowledge contributions in Marine Science to tackle bycatch in the Bay of Biscay

Cazé¹,

Réveillas²,

Danto³

et al. 2022

Front. Mar. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The issue of bycatch is raising considerable political, mediatic and scientific attention. Bycatch is one of the main causes of at-sea mortality for small cetacean species and for seabirds. Scientists are raising alerts regarding the potential effects on the structure of the ecosystem, increasingly aiming for research-action. Decision-makers are facing a political trade-off, with increasing pressure from the European Commission and international nongovernmental organizations to implement mitigation measures such as space-time closure of the fisheries, which could present a risk of altering the well-being of the fishing industry in the short-term. The process of co-creation of knowledge on bycatch is key to understand better the fishers-species interactions and to develop regulations that are adapted to local specificities, towards an adaptive and inclusive socio-ecosystem-based management of the fisheries. But the knowledge co-creation process is hindered by tensions between the interests of stakeholders, the climate of mistrust, dense media coverage and power asymmetries between actors. In parallel, the fast rate of biodiversity degradation is calling for the rapid development of regulations. Understanding the complex system dynamics highlighted by these conflicts requires an analysis of the socio-political dimension of the interactions between fisheries and marine biodiversity. Based on a series of ethnographic interviews with the different stakeholders involved in the bycatch mitigation projects in the Bay of Biscay, this paper explores how co-creating knowledge through conflict and collaboration between researchers and fishers can generate collective learning for bycatch mitigation policies. We adopt an epistemological approach, with the objective to promote transparency in the exchange between researchers and fishers and to inform decision-making at various scales of governance. We argue that co-creation of knowledge on bycatch should not aim for consensus. We conclude that acknowledging the presence of conflicts between the stakeholders, and understanding their roots and their impact on the co-design process can allow identifying factors of path-dependency hindering the adaptive capacity of institutions. Moreover, we highlight the key role of the fishers’ representative bodies in knowledge co-creation, and the importance to improve our understanding of fishers’ perception of their political representation.

show abstract

Quelles représentations pour l’Océan ?

Cuvelier

2024

hybrid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Une coprésence littorale controversée

Cited by 5 publications

References 30 publications

Co-creating Knowledge with Fishers: Challenges and Lessons for Integrating Fishers' Knowledge Contributions into Marine Science in Well-Developed Scientific Advisory Systems

Co-creating Knowledge with Fishers: Challenges and Lessons for Integrating Fishers' Knowledge Contributions into Marine Science in Well-Developed Scientific Advisory Systems

Integrating fishers’ knowledge contributions in Marine Science to tackle bycatch in the Bay of Biscay

Quelles représentations pour l’Océan ?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About