1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01227524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unemployment and immiserizing transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later studies nevertheless discover that the paradox can still occur for untied aid when distortions exist in the economy. Distortions include production externalities (Bhagwati et al., 1985), import tariffs (Jones, 1985), and sectoral unemployment (Beladi, 1990). Kemp and Kojima (1985) and Schweinberger (1990), on the other hand, consider tied aid as another type of distortion and demonstrate that tying aid to consumption can also cause a transfer paradox.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later studies nevertheless discover that the paradox can still occur for untied aid when distortions exist in the economy. Distortions include production externalities (Bhagwati et al., 1985), import tariffs (Jones, 1985), and sectoral unemployment (Beladi, 1990). Kemp and Kojima (1985) and Schweinberger (1990), on the other hand, consider tied aid as another type of distortion and demonstrate that tying aid to consumption can also cause a transfer paradox.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In effect, the transfer may shift resources into or out of the unproductive 'unemployment' sector, see Bhaduri and Skarstein (1996). Before turning to the interaction between non-traded goods and unemployment, we first analyze the model of sticky-wage unemployment outlined in section 3 in the absence of non-traded goods, see also Berthélemy (1988) and Beladi (1990). It is convenient to define:…”
Section: The Unemployment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, later studies indicate that the transfer paradox can occur for the economies with distortions (cf. Beladi, 1990). Hatzipanayotou and Michael (2000) extended the analysis by considering the employment effect of foreign aid on the recipient country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%