2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11150-021-09560-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unequal consequences of Covid 19: representative evidence from six countries

Abstract: Covid-19 and the measures taken to contain it have led to unprecedented constraints on work and leisure activities, across the world. This paper uses nationally representative surveys to document how people of different ages and incomes have been affected in the early phase of the pandemic. The data was collected in six countries (China, South Korea, Japan, Italy, UK, and US) in the third week of April 2020. First, we document changes in job circumstances and social activities. Second, we document self-reporte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
72
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
10
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we do not have additional data to explain this finding, it is possible that the greater news coverage of biomedical research during the pandemic has increased individuals' appreciation for this scientific process [11] and increased individuals' interest in participating in research. It also may be possible that some individuals (especially younger adults and those with high incomes [12,13]) have experienced increased scheduling flexibility due to the pandemic (eg, due to cancelled travel and events and restrictions on many leisure-time activities [14]) and thus may have more free time to participate in research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we do not have additional data to explain this finding, it is possible that the greater news coverage of biomedical research during the pandemic has increased individuals' appreciation for this scientific process [11] and increased individuals' interest in participating in research. It also may be possible that some individuals (especially younger adults and those with high incomes [12,13]) have experienced increased scheduling flexibility due to the pandemic (eg, due to cancelled travel and events and restrictions on many leisure-time activities [14]) and thus may have more free time to participate in research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, this paper documents considerable heterogeneity in the impact of lockdowns across age groups. These findings are quite relevant for the ongoing debate on the distribution of costs and benefits across generations (Belot et al, 2020;. While lockdowns protect mainly older people that are more likely to develop serious medical conditions from COVID-19, they impose economic costs especially on working age people that rely on labor income to support consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, younger workers often have less stable job contracts that are more likely to be terminated during a crisis. Survey based evidence confirms that younger people have been more likely to suffer an income loss during the pandemic (Belot et al, 2020;. The fact that lockdowns impose a disproportionate economic burden on the young-while protecting mostly the old given the higher health risks-calls for policy intervention to ensure inter-generational fairness .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The economic shock caused by the pandemic may also affect men and women differently. Women's jobs are 1.8 times more vulnerable to the impact of the pandemic than men's jobs [16]. Women make up 39% of global employment but account for 54% of overall job losses [16] with concerns that the pandemic may widen the existing gender inequality in job placements [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women's jobs are 1.8 times more vulnerable to the impact of the pandemic than men's jobs [16]. Women make up 39% of global employment but account for 54% of overall job losses [16] with concerns that the pandemic may widen the existing gender inequality in job placements [17,18]. There also may be age, income and educational status differences in the impact of the pandemic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%