Unequal Hard Times: The Influence of the Great Recession on Gender Bias in Entrepreneurial Financing

Abstract

Prior work finds mixed evidence of gender bias in lenders' willingness to approve loans to entrepreneurs during normal macroeconomic conditions. However, various theories predict that gender bias is more likely to manifest when there is greater uncertainty or when decision-makers' choices are under greater scrutiny from others. Such conditions characterized the lending market in the recent economic downturn. This article draws on an analysis of panel data from the Kauffman Firm Survey to investigate how the Great Recession affected the gender gap in entrepreneurial access to financing, net of individual and firm-level characteristics. Consistent with predictions, we find that women-led firms were significantly more likely than men-led firms to encounter difficulty in acquiring funding when small-business lending contracted in 2009 and 2010. We assess the consistency of our results with two different theories of bias or discrimination. Our findings shed light on mechanisms that may contribute to disadvantages for women entrepreneurs and, more broadly, highlight how the effects of ascribed status characteristics (e.g., gender) on economic decision-making may vary systematically with macroeconomic conditions.

The Sustainability of Businesses in Kigali, Rwanda: An Analysis of the Barriers Faced by Women Entrepreneurs

“…The standard deviation of 1.058, though, showed that respondents' opinions were divided on this issue. Thébaud and Sharkey [45] remark that being part of a network helps women entrepreneurs to conduct their business, especially with men entrepreneurs, which enhances the prospects for business growth.…”

The (Un) intended consequences of institutions lowering barriers to entrepreneurship: The impact on female workers

“…These challenges associated with becoming an entrepreneur are particularly acute for women, who face systematic obstacles when identifying opportunities and accumulating resources required to launch and operate a startup (e.g., Hout and Rosen, ; Keister and Moller, ; Kim et al, ). Indeed, entrepreneurial outcomes show stark disparities across gender lines, including the act of starting and running a new venture (Kacperczyk and Guzman, 2019; Thébaud, , ; Thébaud and Sharkey, ). For example, female‐founded ventures appear severely underrepresented amongst new startups, and gender disparities are stronger among new firms with a high‐growth orientation.…”

“…Accordingly, women are considered less qualified and less competent entrepreneurs (Bigelow et al, ; Brooks et al, ; Thébaud, ), and such inferences about their “fitness” with entrepreneurial domains tend to reduce investors' willingness to fund female‐founded ventures (Blanchflower et al, ). For example, the odds of receiving credit from suppliers (Freeland and Keister, ), banks (Thébaud and Sharkey, ), or venture capitalists (Brush et al, ; Guzman and Kacperczyk, ) have been found to be significantly lower for women than for observationally equivalent men. And these disparities tend to persist even when differences in creditworthiness or other observables, including human capital, industry, and credit histories, are controlled for (Blanchflower et al, ; Hout and Rosen, ), or in experimental conditions, wherein gender is randomly assigned (Thébaud, ).…”

Feminist perspectives on social entrepreneurship: critique and new directions

“…The widespread use of cognitive shortcuts in the form of gender stereotyping under high levels of uncertainty and risk explains much of the gender gap in venture finance (Thébaud and Sharkey, 2015). On the one hand, this gender dichotomy that associates men and masculinity with competence in high growth, profitcentric entrepreneurship might be believed to provide women with a greater chance of succeeding in the field of social entrepreneurship.…”