2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.101.035801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unexpected increase of Be7 decay rate under compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that WIEN2k predicts only ∼0.2% faster decay rate of 7 Be in Pd compared to that in Pb due to the compressional effect in the smaller Pd lattice. However, experimentally, a much larger increase (0.82 ± 0.16)% [15] of 7 Be decay rate in Pd lattice compared to that in Pb lattice was seen and hence, the experimentally observed much faster decay rate under compression could not be understood by the state-of-the-art calculations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We find that WIEN2k predicts only ∼0.2% faster decay rate of 7 Be in Pd compared to that in Pb due to the compressional effect in the smaller Pd lattice. However, experimentally, a much larger increase (0.82 ± 0.16)% [15] of 7 Be decay rate in Pd lattice compared to that in Pb lattice was seen and hence, the experimentally observed much faster decay rate under compression could not be understood by the state-of-the-art calculations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Hence, it is conceivable that the standard density matrix and solar model calculations of the electron capture decay rate of 7 Be at the solar core at a pressure of 26.5 million GPa might be underpredicting the actual decay rate and hence, the 2% uncertainty assigned to the calculated 7 Be decay rate at the solar core[R(e)] is questionable. Considering the underprediction by the density functional calculations for the compressions achieved at the laboratory experiments, the uncertainty on the calculated electron-capture nuclear decay rate of 7 Be at the solar core [R(e)] could be as high as ∼10% [15].…”
Section: Astrophysical and Geophysical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations