Unexpected suppression of neural responses to natural foreground versus background sounds in auditory cortex

Abstract

In everyday hearing, listeners encounter complex auditory scenes containing overlapping sounds that must be grouped into meaningful sources, or streamed, to be perceived accurately. A common example of this problem is the perception of a behaviorally relevant foreground stimulus (speech, vocalizations) in complex background noise (environmental, machine noise). Studies using a foreground/background contrast have shown that high-order areas of auditory cortex in humans pre-attentively form an enhanced representation of the foreground over background stimulus. Achieving this invariant foreground representation requires identifying and grouping the features that comprise the background noise so that they can be removed from the representation of the foreground. To study the cortical computations underlying representation of concurrent background (BG) and foreground (FG) stimuli, we recorded single unit responses in the auditory cortex (AC) of ferrets during presentation of natural sound excerpts from these two categories. In primary and secondary AC, we found overall suppression of responses when BGs and FGs were presented concurrently relative to the sum of responses to the same stimuli in isolation. Surprisingly, and in contrast to percepts that emphasize dynamic FGs, responses to FG sounds were suppressed relative to the paired BG sound. The degree of relative FG suppression could be explained by spectro-temporal statistics unique to each natural sound. Moreover, systematic degradation of the same spectro-temporal features decreased FG suppression as the sound categories became progressively less statistically distinct. The strongly suppressed representation of FG sounds in single units of AC in the presence of BG sound reveals a novel insight into how complex acoustic scenes are encoded at early stages of auditory processing.

Noise schemas aid hearing in noise

“…The first representation could be used to derive the second, such that as noise becomes more accurately estimated (e.g., with more exposure to the background), the foreground representation becomes enhanced, as we found here. The existence of such parallel representations is consistent with neurophysiological findings that noise stimuli are represented subcortically 61,62 and preferentially drive neurons in primary auditory cortex 63–65 but appear to be suppressed in non-primary auditory cortex 24,66 .…”