2017
DOI: 10.1038/nature25138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass

Abstract: Carbon stocks in vegetation play a key role in the climate system1–4, but their magnitude and patterns, their uncertainties, and the impact of land use on them remain poorly quantified. Based on a consistent integration of state-of-the art datasets, we show that vegetation currently stores ~450 PgC. In the hypothetical absence of land use, potential vegetation would store ~916 PgC, under current climate. This difference singles out the massive effect land use has on biomass stocks. Deforestation and other land… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

24
445
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 552 publications
(477 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
24
445
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…An experiment with an Earth system model suggests that the observed rise of~115 ppm in atmospheric CO 2 since the preindustrial era might have been higher by~85 ppm without the effect of CO 2 fertilization (Shevliakova et al, 2013), implying a large contribution of CO 2 fertilization to net CO 2 flux (balance between CO 2 uptake and release by the terrestrial biosphere). However, it is still arguable whether the CO 2 fertilization is a dominant cause for the recent enhancement of CO 2 uptake because, in addition to the level of atmospheric CO 2 , the terrestrial biosphere has undergone historical changes through land use and management (Erb et al, 2013(Erb et al, , 2018. CO 2 emissions resulting from land use change (LUC) activities account for~9% of the total global anthropogenic CO 2 emissions (Le Quéré et al, 2016); therefore, changes in LUC could affect the course of the net sink-source pattern of CO 2 over time.…”
Section: 1029/2018gl077633mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experiment with an Earth system model suggests that the observed rise of~115 ppm in atmospheric CO 2 since the preindustrial era might have been higher by~85 ppm without the effect of CO 2 fertilization (Shevliakova et al, 2013), implying a large contribution of CO 2 fertilization to net CO 2 flux (balance between CO 2 uptake and release by the terrestrial biosphere). However, it is still arguable whether the CO 2 fertilization is a dominant cause for the recent enhancement of CO 2 uptake because, in addition to the level of atmospheric CO 2 , the terrestrial biosphere has undergone historical changes through land use and management (Erb et al, 2013(Erb et al, , 2018. CO 2 emissions resulting from land use change (LUC) activities account for~9% of the total global anthropogenic CO 2 emissions (Le Quéré et al, 2016); therefore, changes in LUC could affect the course of the net sink-source pattern of CO 2 over time.…”
Section: 1029/2018gl077633mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the same time period, total plant biomass halved, with cultivated crops accounting for c . 2% of the total (Erb et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, Erb et al. ). Future changes in the terrestrial carbon budget are therefore very relevant for the trajectory of CO 2 atmospheric concentrations and the Earth's climate (IPCC ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%