2015
DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcv065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unfair Pay and Health: The Effects of Perceived Injustice of Earnings on Physical Health

Abstract: Nutzungsbedingungen:Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine Weiterverbreitung -keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Doku… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mental component summary (MCS) and the physical component summary (PCS) scores were generated by conducting a confirmatory factor analysis, 2 (45) = 906.922, p < .001, RMSEA = .069, CFI = .952, TLI = .930; see Appendix, Figure A1) for T1 and T2. In contrast to the conventional computation of the MCS/PCS scales, the factors were allowed to correlate, which reflects the more realistic notion that these two aspects of health may influence each other (Schunck, Sauer, & Valet, 2015;Tucker, Adams, & Wilson, 2014). In accordance with the original approach, both scores were standardized to a sample mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher values indicate better health.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mental component summary (MCS) and the physical component summary (PCS) scores were generated by conducting a confirmatory factor analysis, 2 (45) = 906.922, p < .001, RMSEA = .069, CFI = .952, TLI = .930; see Appendix, Figure A1) for T1 and T2. In contrast to the conventional computation of the MCS/PCS scales, the factors were allowed to correlate, which reflects the more realistic notion that these two aspects of health may influence each other (Schunck, Sauer, & Valet, 2015;Tucker, Adams, & Wilson, 2014). In accordance with the original approach, both scores were standardized to a sample mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher values indicate better health.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New samples are added to the SOEP data at regular intervals to replenish the sample and ensure continuing representativeness of the population in Germany [ 29 , 30 ]. Since the SOEP covers a wide range of topics, including self-reported health behaviour—such as smoking beginning in 1998—it is widely used to study health related outcomes [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. We used the SOEP data set version 29 which includes data until the year 2012.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following equity theory (Adams 1965; Walster, Walster, and Berscheid 1978), scholars have documented the influence of a prominent type of distributive injustice—the sense of unjust earnings—on a variety of emotional, health, and behavioral indicators. These include work-related outcomes, such as job dissatisfaction and turnover (D’Ambrosio, Clark, and Barazzetta 2018; Narisada and Schieman 2016), and also extend to indicators of well-being, such as anger, depression, and physical health symptoms (Hegtvedt 1990; Narisada 2017; Schunck, Sauer, and Valet 2015). Collectively, these results demonstrate that the sense of distributive injustice has significant costs for individuals and organizations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%