“…For a very long time, however, archaeologists were complicit with dictatorial regimes: they produced legitimizing narratives, constructed exclusionary nationalist and ethnonationalist discourses, and participated in institutional work (Díaz-Andreu, 1993; Galaty and Watkinson, 2004; Junker, 1998; Legendre et al, 2007). Times have changed and now archaeologists do not normally work to support dictatorship, but rather the opposite: parallel to the development of the archaeology of the contemporary past, communist, fascist, and other authoritarian regimes have been the object of much research during the last 15 years that has exposed their crimes (Bernbeck, 2018; Dezhamkhooy and Papoli-Yazdi, 2020; Funari et al, 2009; Symonds and Vařeka, 2020; Theune, 2018). The material technologies of oppression, repression, disappearance, and propaganda deployed by such regimes have been explored and important data have been retrieved in a variety of elements, most notably in the case of spaces of detention—prisons, concentration camps, and forced labor camps (Myers and Moshenska, 2011)—and mass graves (Ferrándiz, 2013), but also monuments (Burström and Gelderblom, 2011).…”