2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1711.07837
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UnFlow: Unsupervised Learning of Optical Flow with a Bidirectional Census Loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with a smoothing regularizer for the flow, this method is very effective in learning accurate predictions in nonoccluded regions, but fails when the brightness-constancy constraint is not satisfied, e.g., at occlusion boundaries across specular surfaces. Subsequent works improved these shortcomings by excluding the pixels in occluded regions from the loss using a mask obtained by forward warping [33] or a forward-backward consistency check [25]. Janai et al [17] include multiple frames for occlusion reasoning to obtain sharper flow at boundaries.…”
Section: Unsupervised Flow Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Together with a smoothing regularizer for the flow, this method is very effective in learning accurate predictions in nonoccluded regions, but fails when the brightness-constancy constraint is not satisfied, e.g., at occlusion boundaries across specular surfaces. Subsequent works improved these shortcomings by excluding the pixels in occluded regions from the loss using a mask obtained by forward warping [33] or a forward-backward consistency check [25]. Janai et al [17] include multiple frames for occlusion reasoning to obtain sharper flow at boundaries.…”
Section: Unsupervised Flow Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, deep learning methods have allowed to train a single neural network model to estimate optical flow for any input image pair, with a remarkable improvement in terms of accuracy and estimation efficiency. The natural evolution of the original approach by Horn and Schunk [12] has led to the unsupervised methods for optical flow [17,18,21,22,25,33]. In fact, also these methods formulate a loss function for training that consists of a range of terms, each addressing one of the key ambiguities in the optical flow estimation task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although efforts have been made to seek more accurate regularization terms, OF approaches lack accuracy, especially for t-MRI motion tracking, due to the tag fading and large deformation problems [11,49]. More recently, convolutional neural networks (CNN) are trained to predict OF [16,19,20,24,26,41,31,47,53,51,48]. However, most of these works were supervised methods, with the need of a ground truth OF for training, which is nearly impossible to obtain for medical images.…”
Section: Optical Flow Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost function is designed based on variational methods. USCNN [1], DSTFlow [27], UnFlow [24], etc. are among the methods in this category.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%