2012
DOI: 10.1080/00036811.2011.625016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unfolding-based corrector estimates for a reaction–diffusion system predicting concrete corrosion

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this new geometrical setting, the corresponding compactness results (see, for instance, [] and []) imply that there exist u1H01false(normalΩfalse), trueû1L2false(normalΩ,H per 1(Y1)false), u2H01false(normalΩfalse), u¯2L2false(normalΩ,H per 1(Y2)false), such that scriptMnormalΓfalse(û1false)=0, scriptMnormalΓfalse(u¯2false)=0 and, up to a subsequence, for ε0, we have: leftscriptT1ε(u1ε)u11em strongly in L2(Ω,H1false(Y1false)),leftscriptT1ε(u1ε)u1+yû11em weakly in L2(Ω×Y1),leftscriptT2ε(u2ε)u21em strongly in L2(Ω,H1...…”
Section: The Connected–connected Case; a Comparison Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this new geometrical setting, the corresponding compactness results (see, for instance, [] and []) imply that there exist u1H01false(normalΩfalse), trueû1L2false(normalΩ,H per 1(Y1)false), u2H01false(normalΩfalse), u¯2L2false(normalΩ,H per 1(Y2)false), such that scriptMnormalΓfalse(û1false)=0, scriptMnormalΓfalse(u¯2false)=0 and, up to a subsequence, for ε0, we have: leftscriptT1ε(u1ε)u11em strongly in L2(Ω,H1false(Y1false)),leftscriptT1ε(u1ε)u1+yû11em weakly in L2(Ω×Y1),leftscriptT2ε(u2ε)u21em strongly in L2(Ω,H1...…”
Section: The Connected–connected Case; a Comparison Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variational formulation of problem (43) is exactly (8) written for this new space endowed with the corresponding scalar product (6). In this new geometrical setting, the corresponding compactness results (see, for instance, [24] and [32]) imply that there exist 1 ∈ 1 0 (Ω),̂1 ∈ 2 (Ω, 1 per ( 1 )), 2 ∈ 1 0 (Ω), 2 ∈ 2 (Ω, 1 per ( 2 )), such that  Γ (̂1) = 0,  Γ ( 2 ) = 0 and, up to a subsequence, for → 0, we have:  1 ( 1 ) → 1 strongly in 2 (Ω, 1 ( 1 )),  1 (∇ 1 ) ⇀ ∇ 1 + ∇̂1 weakly in 2 (Ω × 1 ),  2 ( 2 ) → 2 strongly in 2 (Ω, 1 ( 2 )),  2 (∇ 2 ) ⇀ ∇ 2 + ∇ 2 weakly in 2 (Ω × 2 ),…”
Section: The Connected-connected Case; a Comparison Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], the main working tools involve the two-scale convergence concept in the sense of Nguetseng and Allaire 1 combined with a periodic unfolding of the oscillatory boundary. For that reaction-diffusion scenario, we have used the periodic unfolding technique to get correctors very much in the spirit of Griso [21]. Here the situation we are looking at is conceptually different -the microstructures are now allowed to be distributed in a locally (non-uniform!)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this strong notion of convergence, one can ask for quantitative error estimates, see e.g. [17,18,19,20,21], as well as for numerical simulations, see e.g. [22,23,24,25,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume neither additional spatial regularity of the original solutions (u ε , v ε ) nor of the corrector functions. In [20], a reaction-diffusion system predicting concrete corrosion is considered, but the system does not include slowly diffusing species v ε . Nevertheless, for the classically diffusing species u ε and its gradient ∇u ε the convergence rate ε 1/2 and ε 1/4 , respectively, is rigorously proved by the method of periodic unfolding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%