2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03741-2_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unfolding Grammars in Adhesive Categories

Abstract: Abstract. We generalize the unfolding semantics, previously developed for concrete formalisms such as Petri nets and graph grammars, to the abstract setting of (single pushout) rewriting over adhesive categories. The unfolding construction is characterized as a coreflection, i.e. the unfolding functor arises as the right adjoint to the embedding of the category of occurrence grammars into the category of grammars. As the unfolding represents potentially infinite computations, we need to work in adhesive catego… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…pullbacks 5 ; we shall make extensive use of it in this paper and it also essential for the good behaviour of grammar morphisms (see [1]). This lemma implies that, in categories with pullbacks, any fpbc square can be pulled back along a morphism with the "tip" of the square as codomain.…”
Section: Example 1 (Implicit Deletion As Fpbc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pullbacks 5 ; we shall make extensive use of it in this paper and it also essential for the good behaviour of grammar morphisms (see [1]). This lemma implies that, in categories with pullbacks, any fpbc square can be pulled back along a morphism with the "tip" of the square as codomain.…”
Section: Example 1 (Implicit Deletion As Fpbc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with e 2 being a mono (see above) we conclude that e 2 is an isomorphism, because adhesive categories are balanced [16]. This means, there exists a mediating morphismL 3 Fig. 3 we replace rule p 3 by rule p 4 of Fig.…”
Section: D1mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Next, the unfolding of a GTS was defined as a typically infinite non-deterministic process which summarises all the possible derivations of a GTS [4]. Recently, all these concepts have been generalised to transformation systems based on (M-)adhesive categories [8,5,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also believe that this work can be generalized to rewriting in adhesive categories if we use a sesqui-pushout-like setting, as described in [6]. This would require to single out for a given rewriting system, a set of "atomic" subobjects from which any rewritten object can be built, playing the role of places.…”
Section: Finite Prefix For Graph Transformation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%