2015
DOI: 10.1111/acer.12908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unhealthy Alcohol Use is Associated with Monocyte Activation Prior to Starting Antiretroviral Therapy

Abstract: Background Alcohol use may accelerate HIV disease progression, but the plausible biological mechanisms have not been clearly elucidated. Methods HIV-positive persons who were not on anti-retroviral therapy (ART) completed the baseline assessment for a longitudinal study examining the association of alcohol use with HIV disease markers. Oversampling drinkers, baseline samples were tested for markers of monocyte activation (sCD14), inflammation (IL-6), and coagulation (D-dimer). We defined “unhealthy alcohol u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… This can occur by inducing nitric oxide synthase and Nuclear factor kappa‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells (NF‐κB) signalling, which can result in differential expression of tight junction proteins, impairment of gut integrity indirectly through inflammation, or an increase in the LPS‐producing gram‐negative bacterial microflora. Heavy alcohol use in HIV‐infected patients has been found to accelerate HIV disease progression, and one study found an association between unhealthy alcohol intake and higher sCD14 in untreated HIV‐infected subjects in Uganda; however, to the best of our knowledge, no one has previously demonstrated associations of alcohol use with such a broad range of markers of microbial translocation, immune activation, and inflammation in treated HIV‐infected adults. This evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that alcohol, in particular liquor, use increases translocation of LPS, which interacts with LBP, resulting in increased immune activation and inflammation, perhaps resulting in HIV disease progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… This can occur by inducing nitric oxide synthase and Nuclear factor kappa‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells (NF‐κB) signalling, which can result in differential expression of tight junction proteins, impairment of gut integrity indirectly through inflammation, or an increase in the LPS‐producing gram‐negative bacterial microflora. Heavy alcohol use in HIV‐infected patients has been found to accelerate HIV disease progression, and one study found an association between unhealthy alcohol intake and higher sCD14 in untreated HIV‐infected subjects in Uganda; however, to the best of our knowledge, no one has previously demonstrated associations of alcohol use with such a broad range of markers of microbial translocation, immune activation, and inflammation in treated HIV‐infected adults. This evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that alcohol, in particular liquor, use increases translocation of LPS, which interacts with LBP, resulting in increased immune activation and inflammation, perhaps resulting in HIV disease progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in outcomes is perhaps due to difference in study design, population, or the endpoints defining liver disease progression, or related to the low proportion of patients in the current study that reported hazardous alcohol consumption. Our earlier study included women with heavy alcohol use, and there are some data that alcohol use, itself, without significant liver disease, increases sCD14 levels in HIV-infected persons 40,46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion with PEth positive (≥50 ng/ml) and PEth negative (<50ng/ml) was calculated overall and compared to self-reported alcohol use (AUDIT-C scores). This cutoff has been used to define unhealthy alcohol in the prior three months among HIV-positive patients (Carrico et al, 2015; Hahn et al, 2016). Sensitivity analyses were performed where PEth results were compared to other self-reported measures of alcohol: alcohol frequency, number of drinks on a typical day, being drunk or intoxicated recently, recent heavy episodic drinking, and regular heavy drinking.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%