2007
DOI: 10.1080/13601440701217287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Unhomely” Academic Developer Identities: More post‐colonial explorations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other cases, where the researcher is an academic developer, for example, the basis of this asymmetry is less straightforward. Manathunga (2007) highlights the potential dishonesty and tension when academic developers are "positioned as the [more powerful] developer of Others, especially Others who may have had so much more experience of academic work" (p. 27). It is possible that many educational technology researchers who are academic developers in their institution do encounter this tension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, where the researcher is an academic developer, for example, the basis of this asymmetry is less straightforward. Manathunga (2007) highlights the potential dishonesty and tension when academic developers are "positioned as the [more powerful] developer of Others, especially Others who may have had so much more experience of academic work" (p. 27). It is possible that many educational technology researchers who are academic developers in their institution do encounter this tension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither quantitative nor qualitative, our humanities backgrounds in literature and cultural theory occasionally make it difficult for us to feel at "home" in academic development, even though we are both mid-career developers (see Manathunga, 2007). Our original presentation and now our representation of a workshop that was meant to trouble precisely this paradigmatic problem is itself, too, meant to trouble what we see as a dominant discourse in our adopted field of academic development.…”
Section: Prologue: a Collaborative Weavingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a classroom level in non-western context, this practice has forced the African child to absorb western science experiences during learning, despite their being largely irrelevant to individual life experiences (Anamuah-Mensah, 1998;Stewart, 2007). This practice has also left the majority of non-western SE learners being forced to discard their values and indigenous science knowledge and adopt the western ways of knowing and thinking (Manathunga, 2007). The increasing pressure among the non-western world has therefore been on adapting and accepting the science knowledge originating from the west, a practice that is viewed by education stakeholders from the non-western contexts as an imposition to the non-western ways of knowing.…”
Section: Hegemonic Impact Of Western Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%