2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-014-2053-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uni- and bipolar hemiarthroplasty with a modern cemented femoral component provides elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures with equal functional outcome and survivorship at medium-term follow-up

Abstract: Unipolar hemiarthroplasty group had a significantly higher dislocation rate when compared with bipolar hemiarthroplasty group. However, both provide elderly patients with equal ambulatory ability and low revision rate at medium-term follow-up.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Keeping in mind the mean age of living patients and those without revision surgery (91 years), the relatively low Harris hip score can be explained by the age-related disability of the individuals. Studies comparing two different types of surgical treatment (eg, bipolar vs unipolar hemiarthroplasty) found reasonable results regarding recovery of ambulatory status and activities of daily living for patients with bipolar hemiarthroplasties [14,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keeping in mind the mean age of living patients and those without revision surgery (91 years), the relatively low Harris hip score can be explained by the age-related disability of the individuals. Studies comparing two different types of surgical treatment (eg, bipolar vs unipolar hemiarthroplasty) found reasonable results regarding recovery of ambulatory status and activities of daily living for patients with bipolar hemiarthroplasties [14,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Another potential advantage is a lower dislocation rate because of the two bearings. 26 However, the disadvantage of a bipolar HA is the possibility of prosthetic wear, and the higher cost.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Thr and Hamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[27][28][29][30] A more recent prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing the use of unipolar versus bipolar heads did find a significantly lower dislocation rate in the bipolar group (6.8% versus 2.3%). 26 Therefore, we believe when performing HA, a bipolar head may be advantageous when available.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Thr and Hamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 A prospective study by Inngul et al 28 randomized 120 patients over the age of 80 yr with displaced femoral neck fracture into a unipolar HA treatment arm and a bipolar HA treatment arm. Known complications of the HA include groin pain from acetabular erosion, acetabular protusio, dislocation, and the need for a secondary operation.…”
Section: Arthroplastymentioning
confidence: 99%