2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cr.1943-5495.0000090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniaxial Strength and Deformation Properties of Machine-Made Snow

Abstract: Snow as a construction material has been used for centuries, with igloos among the first examples. Each winter, snow and ice villages, buildings, and artwork are built in many places around the world. Machine-made snow manufactured by snow guns is commonly used for constructions made of snow. However, only a few basic studies on machine-made snow have been published. Knowledge based on experience and studies on natural snow constitute the basis for constructions made using snow and ice. Through material tests … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kinosita (1967) conducted compression tests on natural snow samples with densities ranging from 150‐450 kg m −3 at temperatures from −30°C to 0°C at different strain rates, and observed a ductile‐to‐brittle transition at a critical strain rate ranging from 7.8 × 10 −3 to 8.3 × 10 −2 s −1 , which slightly changed with temperatures and densities of snow. Similarly, Lintzen and Edeskar (2015) performed compression tests on man‐made snow with densities ranging from 510 to 560 kg m −3 at −10°C at different strain rates, and found the critical strain rate for the ductile‐to‐brittle transition was ∼3 × 10 −3 s −1 . Wang et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kinosita (1967) conducted compression tests on natural snow samples with densities ranging from 150‐450 kg m −3 at temperatures from −30°C to 0°C at different strain rates, and observed a ductile‐to‐brittle transition at a critical strain rate ranging from 7.8 × 10 −3 to 8.3 × 10 −2 s −1 , which slightly changed with temperatures and densities of snow. Similarly, Lintzen and Edeskar (2015) performed compression tests on man‐made snow with densities ranging from 510 to 560 kg m −3 at −10°C at different strain rates, and found the critical strain rate for the ductile‐to‐brittle transition was ∼3 × 10 −3 s −1 . Wang et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similarly, Lintzen and Edeskar (2015) performed compression tests on man-made snow with densities ranging from 510 to 560 kg m −3 at −10°C at different strain rates, and found the critical strain rate for the ductile-to-brittle transition was ∼3 × 10 −3 s −1 . Wang et al (2021) also performed compression tests at temperatures from −25°C to −5°C at different strain rates on six sets of snow, which were compacted from the snowfall to densities ranging from 350 to 600 kg m −3 , and found the ductile-to-brittle transition occurred at strain rates ranging from ∼8.3 × 10 −4 s −1 to ∼2.5 × 10 −3 s −1 .…”
Section: Optical Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ν = 0.3 is the Poisson number, E base is the elastic modulus of the ski base and E counter is the elastic modulus of the counter surface. Lintzén and Edeskär [42] investigated uni-axial compression of snow of different types, and they estimated the Young's modulus of the snow to be between 100 and 250 MPa for new machine-made snow, and between 50 and 350 MPa for old machine-made snow. The contact mechanics calculations simulating the ski-snow contact performed in this work, are therefore conducted for Young's moduli within the range (20 MPa, 400 MPa.…”
Section: Meso-scale Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the behavior of the ski during a downhill turn, the ski-snow interaction had to be modeled. For doing this, the Lintzèn [19] model of snow was used. It is based on experimental compression tests on big frozen snow cylindrical samples.…”
Section: Behavior Of the Ski During A Carving Turnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the ski-snow interaction was simulated. The snow was modeled according to Lintzèn [19]. Different roll angles and loads were simulated to better understand the behavior of the ski under operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%