2019
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-019-1374-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniaxial tensile behavior of aligned steel fibre reinforced cementitious composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The B-nozzle increased the mean fiber orientation coefficient by approximately 31~39% and the fiber distribution coefficient by 3~23%. By comparing aligned steel fiber cementitious composites and plain cement composite with randomly distributed steel fibers, fiber alignment contributed better performance in terms of uniaxial tensile strength and post-cracking toughness as demonstrated by Qing et al [ 18 ]. Ma et al [ 19 ] proposed a printed cementitious material with a good fiber alignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The B-nozzle increased the mean fiber orientation coefficient by approximately 31~39% and the fiber distribution coefficient by 3~23%. By comparing aligned steel fiber cementitious composites and plain cement composite with randomly distributed steel fibers, fiber alignment contributed better performance in terms of uniaxial tensile strength and post-cracking toughness as demonstrated by Qing et al [ 18 ]. Ma et al [ 19 ] proposed a printed cementitious material with a good fiber alignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1977, Miller and Björklund 17 pioneered the magnetic field method and utilized it for the first time to realize fiber alignment. Mu et al 22–25 prepared ASFRC specimens by electromagnetic field method and found that compared with SFRC, with the same fiber volume dosage, the tensile strength, flexural strength, and shear strength of ASFRC were increased by 30%–60%, 50%–900%, and 35%–45%, respectively. Qing et al 26 found that for ASFRC relative to that of random SFRC, the average efficiency of fracture parameters improved by 50%–80% in pre‐peak behavior and more than 100% in terms of post‐peak response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now widely accepted that the steel fibres mainly provide crack bridging and constraining capacity coming from the bonding between fibres and mortar matrix, the slip‐dependent friction, and the snubbing friction 22 . The slip‐dependent friction depends on the matrix strength, fibre length, fibre geometries, and interfacial bonding properties, while the snubbing friction is closely related to fibre geometries, fibre yielding strength, matrix strength, and especially the fibre inclination angle with respect to the crack surface 23,24 . The snubbing effect increases as the snubbing friction and is associated with matrix spalling at the pullout exit 23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%