2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.07.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniaxially oriented carbon monoliths as supercapacitor electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
37
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is to be appreciated that the capacitance values from the impedance studies are comparable with those calculated from CV studies and this result thus supports the observation made by Garcia-Gomez et al [66] to corroborate the fact that the specific capacitance value evaluated from AC impedance studies would be comparable to that obtained from CV or charge-discharge studies provided the low frequency set in impedance studies, the sweep rate in CV studies and the current in charge-discharge studies are comparable enough. …”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It is to be appreciated that the capacitance values from the impedance studies are comparable with those calculated from CV studies and this result thus supports the observation made by Garcia-Gomez et al [66] to corroborate the fact that the specific capacitance value evaluated from AC impedance studies would be comparable to that obtained from CV or charge-discharge studies provided the low frequency set in impedance studies, the sweep rate in CV studies and the current in charge-discharge studies are comparable enough. …”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 80%
“…faster charge/discharge of the cell) [6]. The effect of the three-dimensional character of the monolith on the electrical response of the cells has also been studied [21]. As the monolith height increases, (i) the cell capacitance increases significantly, which is an advantage, (ii) the cell resistance increases slightly, which is a moderate drawback, and (iii) the response time becomes longer, which is an important drawback.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the monolith height increases, (i) the cell capacitance increases significantly, which is an advantage, (ii) the cell resistance increases slightly, which is a moderate drawback, and (iii) the response time becomes longer, which is an important drawback. So, thicker monoliths are better for improving cell energy and thinner monoliths are better for improving cell power [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher potential can be controlled by modifying the electrolyte properties, 12,13 while a lower ESR value can be achieved by reducing the internal resistance of the electrode and the contact resistance between the electrodes and the current collectors. 9 It has been observed that supercapacitors with low ESR values can be fabricated by modifying aluminium current collectors with carbon material via sol-gel and coating, 11 modifying aluminium current [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Studies on the modification of separators have also been reported elsewhere. 27,28 Recently, the low ESR value has been achieved by modifying the SS current collector by the deposition of platinum nanoparticles, wherein the modified current collector was tested in supercapacitor cell fabricated with activated carbon monolith (ACM) electrode derived from rubber wood saw dust.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%