2002
DOI: 10.1137/s0036142901384162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified Analysis of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Elliptic Problems

Abstract: Abstract. We provide a framework for the analysis of a large class of discontinuous methods for second-order elliptic problems. It allows for the understanding and comparison of most of the discontinuous Galerkin methods that have been proposed over the past three decades for the numerical treatment of elliptic problems. . These DG methods were then usually called interior penalty (IP) methods, and their development remained independent of the development of the DG methods for hyperbolic equations. In this pap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
2,875
1
35

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,838 publications
(2,929 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
18
2,875
1
35
Order By: Relevance
“…(iii) On the other extreme, the class of discontinuous Galerkin methods uses basis functions which are allowed to experience jump discontinuities across the interfaces [173,6]. These are particularly effective basis functions in problems with low regularity, such as the Eikonal equation [221] or problems with shock discontinuities [47,142].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) On the other extreme, the class of discontinuous Galerkin methods uses basis functions which are allowed to experience jump discontinuities across the interfaces [173,6]. These are particularly effective basis functions in problems with low regularity, such as the Eikonal equation [221] or problems with shock discontinuities [47,142].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5]). On a boundary face F = ∂K∩∂Ω, we set [ We collect all interior (respectively, boundary) faces in the set…”
Section: Model Problem and Dg Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to perform the stability analysis, it is convenient to rewrite the relaxation scheme described in section 3.3 in a more compact form by eliminating the unknown v from the final system: in order to do that, we need to introduce the so-called lifting operators (see [3]). …”
Section: Reformulationmentioning
confidence: 99%