2021
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/2020081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified analysis of discontinuous Galerkin andC0-interior penalty finite element methods for Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman and Isaacs equations

Abstract: We provide a unified analysis of a posteriori  and a priori  error bounds for a broad class of discontinuous Galerkin and $C^0$-IP finite element approximations of fully nonlinear second-order elliptic Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman and Isaacs equations with Cordes coefficients. We prove the existence and uniqueness of strong solutions in $H^2$ of Isaacs equations with Cordes coefficients posed on bounded convex domains. We then show the reliability and efficiency of computable residual-based error estimators f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work will focus on the numerical homogenization of other fully nonlinear partial differential equations such as the Isaacs equation. The strong H 2 solution of Isaacs equations with Cordes coefficients has recently been discussed in [27] and can be used as a framework to study its numerical homogenization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future work will focus on the numerical homogenization of other fully nonlinear partial differential equations such as the Isaacs equation. The strong H 2 solution of Isaacs equations with Cordes coefficients has recently been discussed in [27] and can be used as a framework to study its numerical homogenization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in the context of these problems, DG and C 0 -IP methods are examples of nonconforming methods, since the appropriate functional setting is in H 2 -type spaces. In [36], we provide a unified analysis of a posteriori and a priori error bounds for a wide family of DG and C 0 -IP methods, where we also show that the original method of [49,50], along with many related variants, is quasi-optimal in the sense of near-best approximations without any additional regularity assumptions, along with convergence in the small mesh-limit for minimal regularity solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In order to focus on the most important aspects of analysis, we shall restrict our attention to Isaacs and HJB equations without lower-order terms, although we note that the approach we consider here easily accommodates problems with lower-order terms, see [36,50,51]. More precisely, let the real valued functions a i j = a ji and f belong to C( × A × B) for each i, j = 1, .…”
Section: Variational Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative approach, recently proposed in [35] in the context of nonlinear PDEs in nondivergence form, is to reconstruct the solution into C 1 -conforming spaces introduced in [17,45]. While this allows us to avoid problems with element geometries, it introduces the disadvantage in the current context that the resulting error estimate would gain an additional suboptimality of order p d in d spatial dimensions, due to the repeated application of a polynomial inverse estimate apparently necessary for the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%