2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.72.067303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified analysis of spin isospin responses of nuclei

Abstract: We investigate the Gamow-Teller (GT) response functions at a momentum transfer of q = 0 fm −1 and the pionic response functions for quasielastic scattering (QES) at q ≈ 1.7 fm −1 using the continuum random phase approximation with the π + ρ + g model interaction. The Landau-Migdal (LM) parameters, g NN and g N , are estimated by comparing the calculations with recent experimental data. The peak of the GT resonance and the pionic response functions below the QES peak constrain g NN , whereas the quenching of th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the figure, our discrete results have been folded with a Lorentz function of 1 MeV width. The arrows indicate the experimental values of the main peak energies [44][45][46][47]. The consistency and convergence of our calculations can be verified by observing the sum rule values given in Table VI.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In the figure, our discrete results have been folded with a Lorentz function of 1 MeV width. The arrows indicate the experimental values of the main peak energies [44][45][46][47]. The consistency and convergence of our calculations can be verified by observing the sum rule values given in Table VI.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Empirically, the Landau parameter G 0 has been extensively investigated, and its value can vary from about zero to 1.6 depending on the models and methods [32,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. In the present work with the standard SHF approach, a positive G 0 leads to G V 70 MeV fm 5 as shown in Fig.…”
Section: The Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…As suggested in Refs. [67,68], and taken into account by the fit of SAMi, we ought to respect the relations G ′ 0 > G 0 > 0. Here, we obtain slightly different values with respect to SAMi as we are attempting to include more terms in the functional (tensor terms) and to reconcile with different pseudo-data (associated with neutron-proton drops and neutron drops from RBHF calculations).…”
Section: A Fitted Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%