2014
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201451005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified bandgap engineering of graphene nanoribbons

Abstract: Unified bandgap engineering, valid both for the armchair and zigzag graphene nanoribbons (GNRs), is enunciated. Using the boundary condition appropriate for K-K 0 points of the Dirac cones, GNRs are shown to exhibit three distinct semiconducting states SC0, SC1, and SC2 with complete absence of metallic state. The experimental bandgap for 7-AGNR and 13-AGNR armchair (A) is found to be in excellent agreement with SC1 state. Similar associations are pointed out for other configurations. Both the experimental dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, there have been different works proposing analytical relations between the effective mass and other GNR parameters. For example, Arora et al proposed the effective mass to be linearly dependent on the GNR band gap in a similar way as that claimed for carbon nanotubes: m* = (E g / 11.37) m e , with E g given in eV [83]. In turn, Raza et al related it to the aGNR width W through m* = (0.091 / W) m e for the 3p family, m* = (0.160 / W) m e for the 3p+1 family and m* = (0.005 / W) m e for the 3p-1 family (W being the distance, in nanometers, between the C atoms on either edge of the ribbon, based on a C-C bond length of 1.44 Å) [78].…”
Section: Tuning Through Width Controlmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Interestingly, there have been different works proposing analytical relations between the effective mass and other GNR parameters. For example, Arora et al proposed the effective mass to be linearly dependent on the GNR band gap in a similar way as that claimed for carbon nanotubes: m* = (E g / 11.37) m e , with E g given in eV [83]. In turn, Raza et al related it to the aGNR width W through m* = (0.091 / W) m e for the 3p family, m* = (0.160 / W) m e for the 3p+1 family and m* = (0.005 / W) m e for the 3p-1 family (W being the distance, in nanometers, between the C atoms on either edge of the ribbon, based on a C-C bond length of 1.44 Å) [78].…”
Section: Tuning Through Width Controlmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In understanding the role of carbon-based devices, Arora and coworkers [39][40][41][42][43] discovered a curious fact that the missing bandgap in graphene perhaps can be created by quantum effects in bringing to focus the role of Dirac fermions. In particular, the conduction or valence band E g /2 = m * v 2 F is created similar to the Einstein's E = mc 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron transport efficiency is an important quantity which is introduced as conductance. The Landauer formula relates G (conductance) with T (probability of carrier transmission between electrodes) in graphene, 19 and h is the Planck constant: 20…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%