2010
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2009.2038784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified Exact Performance Analysis of Two-Hop Amplify-and-Forward Relaying in Nakagami Fading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
117
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cases can also be found in [22, (55)] but (10) is more tractable for deriving the kth derivative. The k-th derivative of (10) and (12) can be obtained easily and are given as (13) and (14) …”
Section: Single Relay With Two-hop Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…cases can also be found in [22, (55)] but (10) is more tractable for deriving the kth derivative. The k-th derivative of (10) and (12) can be obtained easily and are given as (13) and (14) …”
Section: Single Relay With Two-hop Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, by using (13), and (14) in (6) or (7), AUC based summary detection performance of the coordinator for a single 2-hop relay system can be easily obtained for i. …”
Section: Single Relay With Two-hop Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The end-to-end SNR of AF dual-hop relaying systems, denoted by γ c , has a well-known form [10], [9], which generally can be expressed as γ c = γ1γ2 γ1+γ2+b , where γ 1 and γ 2 are the combined SNRs on the first and second hops respectively, and b is a constant. The case when b = 0 represents the channel-assisted relay configuration, whereas b = 1 gives the channel noiseassisted relay configuration.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the end-to-end signal-to-noise 154 ratio (SNR) can be shown as are the hop SNRs, 157 g A and g B are the fading coefficients, and 2σ 2 is the noise 158 variance at both the ground user and the remote station. 159 Assume Nakagami-m fading channels so that one has Using (8) and (9), the cumulative distribution func-166 tion (CDF) of γ AF can be derived as [16] 167 F AF (x) = 1 − 2e…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%