“…Machine learning potentials (MLPs) have recently emerged as highly promising tools in computational materials science due to their near-DFT accuracy, nearly linear scaling with system size, and exceptional transferability to diverse chemical environments. Prominent examples of MLPs include neural network potentials (NNPs), − Gaussian approximation potentials, , moment tensor potentials, spectral neighbor analysis potentials, atomic CE potentials, , and graph NNPs. − The high flexibility of MLPs allows for broad applicability across different types of matter, encompassing bulk − and 2D crystals, amorphous materials, , liquids, − interfaces, , and clusters. , In the domain of disordered systems, MLPs were employed to investigate binary alloys spanning a wide range of compositions, − high-entropy alloys, − and grain boundaries. − However, a conspicuous gap exists in the literature concerning the application of MLPs to nonstoichiometric systems characterized by varying elevated vacancy concentrations. Herein, we address this gap by examining the efficacy of NNPs for modeling nonstoichiometric chromium sulfides, a material that has not been explored in the existing literature using either machine learning or conventional potentials.…”