2003
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/16/5/314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified picture of N el order destruction, d-wave superconductivity and the pseudogap phase for highTccuprates

Abstract: Evolution from Néel order to d x 2 −y 2 -wave superconductivity in the high T c cuprates is described in terms of the skyrmion-like spin texture induced by the doped hole. The pseudogap phase, which is associated with preformed pairs, appears when the antiferromagnetic correlation length exceeds the average hole distance. A universal formula is proposed for the pseudogap temperature versus the doped hole concentration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(100 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The superconductivity observed in the LaAg 1 –x Mn x alloys with x ≥ 0.05 has many striking features that do not fit into 40 the standard BCS framework of conventional phonon‐mediated superconductivity. On the other hand, with the AFM critical phase boundary ( y 0 = 0) identified as $x_{{\rm c}} \cong 0.05$ , the specific heat and resistivity data 40 exactly reproduce the predictions, based on the self‐consistently renormalized spin fluctuation theories 30–38, that (a) at the AFM critical phase boundary, the electronic part of specific heat $C_{{\rm SF}} /T{\propto} {-} T^{1/2} $ at low temperatures, and varies as −log T at higher temperatures (Fig. 5) while concomitantly, the resistivity varies with temperature as $\rho (T,\,H = 0){\propto} {-} T^{3/2} $ at low temperatures (Fig.…”
Section: Unconventional Superconductivitysupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The superconductivity observed in the LaAg 1 –x Mn x alloys with x ≥ 0.05 has many striking features that do not fit into 40 the standard BCS framework of conventional phonon‐mediated superconductivity. On the other hand, with the AFM critical phase boundary ( y 0 = 0) identified as $x_{{\rm c}} \cong 0.05$ , the specific heat and resistivity data 40 exactly reproduce the predictions, based on the self‐consistently renormalized spin fluctuation theories 30–38, that (a) at the AFM critical phase boundary, the electronic part of specific heat $C_{{\rm SF}} /T{\propto} {-} T^{1/2} $ at low temperatures, and varies as −log T at higher temperatures (Fig. 5) while concomitantly, the resistivity varies with temperature as $\rho (T,\,H = 0){\propto} {-} T^{3/2} $ at low temperatures (Fig.…”
Section: Unconventional Superconductivitysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This unconventional form of superconductivity is thought to arise from the d ‐wave spin‐singlet ( p ‐wave spin‐triplet) pairing of electrons caused by interactions mediated by AFM (FM) spin fluctuations. The spin fluctuation mechanism has the ability to explain 30–38, on the same physical footing, very low superconducting transition temperatures $T_{{\rm c}} \approx 1\,{\rm K}$ or lower in some of the above‐mentioned 3D superconductors as against strongly enhanced AFM susceptibilities and high T c s ≈ 100 K in the quasi‐two‐dimensional (2D) perovskite oxides.…”
Section: Unconventional Superconductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…111,112 If there were something topological at work in individual cuprate copper oxide layers, for instance a Chern-Simons term or some kind of vortices, then possibly when the layers are stacked they could produce a Weyl phase and Fermi arcs. [113][114][115] • Electron/hole loops. As briefly outlined earlier in this text, weak (anti)localization is caused by Cooperons tracing loops.…”
Section: Postscript: How To Do Topology In a Strongly Interacting Mat...mentioning
confidence: 99%