2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified Push Recovery Fundamentals: Inspiration from Human Study

Abstract: Currently for balance recovery, humans outperform humanoid robots that used hand-designed controllers. This study aims to close this gap by finding control principles which are shared across all recovery strategies. We do this by formulating experiments to test human strategies and quantify criteria for identifying strategies. A minimum jerk control principle is shown to accurately recreate human CoM recovery trajectories. Using this principle, we formulate a Model-Predictive Control (MPC) for the use in float… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though heuristics for energy efficient step regions are nonlinear, they can be learned by humans to achieve complex stepping behaviors. Figure 2b shows step selection during human push recovery for initial Center of Mass (CoM) push velocities from the work in [3], which are offset by mean initial velocity of non-stepping trials (0.1103 m/s) and show the stochasticity of human stepping [22,23]. In this study, our findings on the underlying optimality of stepping motions also help explain the stochasticity of human stepping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though heuristics for energy efficient step regions are nonlinear, they can be learned by humans to achieve complex stepping behaviors. Figure 2b shows step selection during human push recovery for initial Center of Mass (CoM) push velocities from the work in [3], which are offset by mean initial velocity of non-stepping trials (0.1103 m/s) and show the stochasticity of human stepping [22,23]. In this study, our findings on the underlying optimality of stepping motions also help explain the stochasticity of human stepping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Additionally, balance can be recovered using similar step locations and swing times for different initial CoM velocities by trading off energy optimality, which can potentially explain the large variations in step location in human study [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, balance can be recovered using similar step locations and swing times for different initial CoM velocities by trading off energy optimality, which can potentially explain the large variations in step location in human study [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 2(b), from [8], shows step positions for human balance recovery (see Fig. 2(a)), offset by mean initial velocity of nonstepping trials (0.1103 m/s) and shows the stochasticity of human stepping [32], [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demands robustness against dynamic disturbances, including modelling errors and external disturbances, and adaptability to different tasks, such as climbing stairs and crouching pass low passages. To this end, schemes that make use of various balance strategies such as the ankle, hip, stepping, and height variation strategies [1] (see Fig. 1) have been developed by the robotics community in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%