2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.95.115101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified trend of superconducting transition temperature versus Hall coefficient for ultrathin FeSe films prepared on different oxide substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even allowing for band bending effects increasing the thickness of the charge transfer layer in the specific electric dipole layer configuration of Ref. [26], it appears reasonable to consider that proximity effects cannot be ignored in > 1 ML thick FeSe layer. In this respect it is interesting to note that the value n 2D s 1.4 × 10 14 cm −2 obtained from the excess electron determination by ARPES is about a factor of four lower than the present determination of the superconducting carrier density n 2D s 6 ± 2 × 10 14 cm −2 of our heterostructure containing 1+4 FeSe layers.…”
Section: Determination Of Microscopic Superconducting Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even allowing for band bending effects increasing the thickness of the charge transfer layer in the specific electric dipole layer configuration of Ref. [26], it appears reasonable to consider that proximity effects cannot be ignored in > 1 ML thick FeSe layer. In this respect it is interesting to note that the value n 2D s 1.4 × 10 14 cm −2 obtained from the excess electron determination by ARPES is about a factor of four lower than the present determination of the superconducting carrier density n 2D s 6 ± 2 × 10 14 cm −2 of our heterostructure containing 1+4 FeSe layers.…”
Section: Determination Of Microscopic Superconducting Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ARPES measurements indicated charge transfer from the substrate and superconductivity to be restricted to the FeSe interface layer with the top layer displaying charge neutrality. However, in our discussion below we will also address the question of the possible contribution of these additional layers to the observed supercarrier density, in view of our and recent results of charge distributions in ultrathin films 26 . A ∼ 25 nm thick layer of amorphous Se was added for protection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicate that an in situ process without exposure to air [40] is necessary for electric-field-induced superconductivity in FeSe EDLTs if an electrochemically etching process [34,38,39] is not employed. as-grown film and film exposed to air for 60 min are shown for comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These findings suggest that the particular structures generated at the surface act as an obstacle to field-induced phase transition and superconductivity in the FeSe EDLTs. For this reason, electrochemical etching [34,38,39], which should be able to remove the particular structures, is effective for achieving high-T c EDLTs if the FeSe channels must be exposed to air during the device fabrication process.…”
Section: Edlt Using Air-exposed Channel Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation