2003
DOI: 10.11650/twjm/1500558401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform Convergence Theorem for the H1-Integral Revisited

Abstract: In this note we show that the uniform convergence theorem for the H 1 -integral is false.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the original paper [6], a few further publications appeared [4], [5], [7], [8], [12], [13], and the H 1 -integral is already quite thoroughly investigated. Since the H 1 -integral is in fact a gauge integral (with the only difference in defining the limit of integral sums in slightly stronger terms), its theory helps to understand better the influence of gauges on Riemann-type integration.…”
Section: The H 1 -Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the original paper [6], a few further publications appeared [4], [5], [7], [8], [12], [13], and the H 1 -integral is already quite thoroughly investigated. Since the H 1 -integral is in fact a gauge integral (with the only difference in defining the limit of integral sums in slightly stronger terms), its theory helps to understand better the influence of gauges on Riemann-type integration.…”
Section: The H 1 -Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is the only convergence theorem which is known for this integral. The Beppo Levi (montone convergence) [12], the Lebesgue (dominated convergence) [12], and even the uniform convergence [7] theorems do not hold. Not every derivative is H 1 -integrable, but every derivative is the limit of a uniformly convergent sequence of H 1 -integrable functions [8].…”
Section: The H 1 -Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%