2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42967-021-00136-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform Subspace Correction Preconditioners for Discontinuous Galerkin Methods with hp-Refinement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adapted the unified framework for DG methods for elliptic problems presented in [2] to the VEF equations to derive analogues of the interior penalty (IP), second method of Bassi and Rebay (BR2), Minimal Dissipation Local Discontinuous Galerkin (MDLDG), and continuous finite element (CG) methods. The uniform subspace correction preconditioner developed by Pazner and Kolev [3] was shown to be effective leading to iteration counts independent of the mesh size, polynomial order, and penalty parameter. GMRES convergence estimates for the preconditioned system were derived for the nonsymmetric VEF system of equations under relatively mild assumptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We adapted the unified framework for DG methods for elliptic problems presented in [2] to the VEF equations to derive analogues of the interior penalty (IP), second method of Bassi and Rebay (BR2), Minimal Dissipation Local Discontinuous Galerkin (MDLDG), and continuous finite element (CG) methods. The uniform subspace correction preconditioner developed by Pazner and Kolev [3] was shown to be effective leading to iteration counts independent of the mesh size, polynomial order, and penalty parameter. GMRES convergence estimates for the preconditioned system were derived for the nonsymmetric VEF system of equations under relatively mild assumptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the mesh T is nonconforming (e.g. as the result of adaptive mesh refinement), or when the DG finite element space Y p has variable polynomial degrees, then a more sophisticated subspace decomposition is required [3]. In this case, the boundary subspace Y B is decomposed into a collection of smaller subspaces defined on each non-conforming edge.…”
Section: Decomposition Into Conforming and Interface Subspacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 12 (CG preconditioning for DG methods). The use of continuous Galerkin discretizations (together with a smoothing operation, such as Jacobi or Gauss-Seidel) as preconditioners for discontinuous Galerkin methods has been studied extensively in the literature [3,31,66,67]. Theorem 4 gives an alternative, elementary, proof of the optimality of CG preconditioning for DG methods.…”
Section: Mass Matrix Preconditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fischer and Lottes developed Schwarz solvers for the pressure solver of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations using low-order preconditioning in [36,55]. Pazner and Kolev applied low-order preconditioning to high-order continuous and discontinuous Galerkin methods with (nonconforming) hp-refinement [66,67]. The aforementioned works use tensor-product elements (mapped quadrilaterals and hexahedra); Chalmers and Warbuton [25] and Olson [61] considered the extension to simplex elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%