2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniform superconvergent analysis of a new mixed finite element method for nonlinear Bi-wave singular perturbation problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. We start to prove the existence of the solution h of problem (5). In fact, from (3) and (5), we get…”
Section: Well-posedness Of the Approximation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proof. We start to prove the existence of the solution h of problem (5). In fact, from (3) and (5), we get…”
Section: Well-posedness Of the Approximation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prove the well‐posedness of the approximation solution through Brouwer's fixed point theorem and derive optimal error estimate in the energy norm independent of the negative powers of the real perturbation parameter δ , that is, quasi‐uniform behavior. In particular, the nonlinear term of problem (1) is dealt with rigorously through a splitting technique [5] based on the monotonically increasing character of f ( ψ ) in the whole error analysis. It seems that optimal error estimate of the proposed method has improved the corresponding conclusion of [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, 0 < δ < 1 is expected to be small for d-wave superconductors and problem (1.1) degenerates into the semilinear parabolic equation when δ → 0. In recent years, there are some theoretical analysis and numerical simulations about FEMs, such as optimal order error estimates of conforming Galerkin FEMs and the modified Morleytype discontinuous Galerkin FEMs in [10,11], uniform superconvergence error estimates of Ciarlet-Raviart schemes with the conforming and nonconforming elements in [12][13][14]. But these work mainly focused on the stationary singularly perturbed Bi-wave problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the conforming FEMs studied in [1,11], C 0 continuous and discontinuous nonconforming (i.e., C 0 and non-C 0 nonconforming) FEMs were discussed in [10], and convergence analyses were established. On the other hand, the high accuracy analysis of nonconforming FEMs has been an active research area in practical computations, and many high accuracy results have been derived for variational inequalities and the boundary value problem [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. However, for the plate obstacle problem (4) with a rigid obstacle, the exact solution u only belongs to H 3 (Ω) ∩ C 2 (Ω) instead of H 4 loc (Ω) [21,22]; thus, the lack of H 4 regularity makes it impossible to develop high accuracy analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%