1934
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1934.00160160096006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unilateral and Bilateral Resection of the Major and Minor Splanchnic Nerves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1935
1935
1954
1954

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In subjects with hypertension they state that binding an extremity produced a higher and more sustained elevation of blood pressure than in normal individuals, and conclude from these results that hypertension is due to vasoconstriction in the splanchnic area. Splanchnic section has been performed (9,10) in patients with hypertension on the basis of the same assumption, and lowering of the blood pressure has been alleged to follow such operations. Critical examination of the above experiments, however, fails to furnish any conclusive evidence that the increased vascular resistance is confined to the 63 splanchnic area.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In subjects with hypertension they state that binding an extremity produced a higher and more sustained elevation of blood pressure than in normal individuals, and conclude from these results that hypertension is due to vasoconstriction in the splanchnic area. Splanchnic section has been performed (9,10) in patients with hypertension on the basis of the same assumption, and lowering of the blood pressure has been alleged to follow such operations. Critical examination of the above experiments, however, fails to furnish any conclusive evidence that the increased vascular resistance is confined to the 63 splanchnic area.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In subjects with hypertension they state that binding an extremity produced a higher and more sustained elevation of blood pressure than in normal individuals, and conclude from these results that hypertension is due to vasoconstriction in the splanchnic area. Splanchnic section has been performed (9,10) in patients with hypertension on the basis of the same assumption, and lowering of the blood pressure has been alleged to follow such operations. Critical examination of the above experiments, however, fails to furnish any conclusive evidence that the increased vascular resistance is confined to the splanchnic area.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surgical approach to the treatment of hypertension was also received with too much unwarranted enthusiasm but, in retrospect, extensive sympathectomies have added comfort and years to the lives of some hypertensive persons (4, 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%