Unilateral congenital mydriasis

Suzuki, Tsubura; Obara, Yoshitaka; Fujita, Takako; Shoji, Eiichi

doi:10.1136/bjo.78.5.420

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hersh et al (1987) reported the same findings in three generations, naming this entity 'familial iridoplegia'. In these cases there were negligible reactions to pharmacological agents, as was confirmed by Suzuki (1994) with a case of unilateral congenital mydriasis. Richardson & Schulenburg (1992) reported a similar patient, but further examination revealed a case of Gillespie's syndrome, which is a different diagnosis with aplasia of the peripheral iris, mental retardation and cerebellar ataxia.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

Congenital mydriasis combined with aneurysmal dilatation of a persistent ductus arteriosus Botalli: a rare syndrome

Lindberg

Brunvand

2005

Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

Congenital mydriasis combined with aneurysmal dilatation of a persistent ductus arteriosus Botalli: a rare syndrome

Lindberg

Brunvand

2005

Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Only two male patients with unilateral congenital mydriasis have been reported in the literature. 4,5 Buys et al reported a case having congenital mydriasis associated with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in 1993. 6 Graf and Jungherr reported congenital mydriasis, accommodation failure, and patent ductus arteriosus in two patients.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Congenital Mydriasis: Diagnostic Challenge in a Case with Accompanying Neurologic Symptoms

Atik¹,

Koç²,

Kaplan³

et al. 2014

Neuro-Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A 34-year-old woman was hospitalised with acute onset nausea, vomiting, ataxia, nystagmus, blurred vision, and bilateral mydriasis. Toxicologic investigations and serologic tests for infectious aetiologies were negative. Demyelinating disease was suspected based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings but there were no lesions at the midbrain explaining bilateral mydriasis. Direct light, consensual light, and near responses for pupil were all negative. Biomicroscopic examination of the iris did not show any sphincter damage or tonic movements. Pupils didn't respond to pilocarpine (0.1% and 2%) and remained unresponsive during the follow-up period. Congenital mydriasis was diagnosed because old photographs revealed that pupils were dilated previously.

show abstract

Congenital mydriasis: spontaneous resolution in one of two cases

Polomeno

2005

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Unilateral congenital mydriasis

Cited by 4 publications

References 7 publications

Congenital mydriasis combined with aneurysmal dilatation of a persistent ductus arteriosus Botalli: a rare syndrome

Congenital mydriasis combined with aneurysmal dilatation of a persistent ductus arteriosus Botalli: a rare syndrome

Congenital Mydriasis: Diagnostic Challenge in a Case with Accompanying Neurologic Symptoms

Congenital mydriasis: spontaneous resolution in one of two cases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About