2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2011.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unilateral CVA for CDS in a contagion model with stochastic pre-intensity and interest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their empirical results show that the default of one company can influence the credit spreads of other companies. The significant impact of contagion on credit value is found in studies by Hatchett and Kühn (2009) and Bao et al. (2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Their empirical results show that the default of one company can influence the credit spreads of other companies. The significant impact of contagion on credit value is found in studies by Hatchett and Kühn (2009) and Bao et al. (2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…At present, the research on the contagion model of credit risk in the financial market mainly includes the following three categories: the simplified model, the structured model, and the complex network evolution model. The stochastic theory-based simplified model and structured model are used to describe the impact and contagion effects on the creditor under different circumstances of credit default strength and default loss rate of the debtor [5][6][7][8][9][10]. The method of structural model assumes that the dynamic process of corporate assets depends on a set of common state variables, and that the interfirm default correlation arises from the dynamic evolution of the firm's asset value [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stochastic theory-based simplified model and structured model are used to describe the impact and contagion effects on the creditor under different circumstances of credit default strength and default loss rate of the debtor [5][6][7][8][9][10]. The method of structural model assumes that the dynamic process of corporate assets depends on a set of common state variables, and that the interfirm default correlation arises from the dynamic evolution of the firm's asset value [9]. The simplified model directly models the process of corporate default intensity, and the default correlation is determined by the intensity of the default process, without considering the relationship between the default and the company value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing contributions focus mostly on the computation of value adjustments (with and without collateralization) in various credit risk models. Counterparty credit risk and valuation adjustments for uncollateralized CDS are studied by Hull and White (2001), Brigo and Chourdakis (2009), Blanchet-Scalliet and Patras (2008), Lipton and Sepp (2009) and Bao et al (2010), among others. Counterparty credit risk for collateralized CDS is discussed in Bielecki et al (2011), Fujii andTakahashi (2011) and Brigo et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%