1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unilateral Do-Not-Resuscitate Order in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In principle, treatment options should be discussed with parents. But, there is broad consensus that there is no moral obligation to offer treatments that are not medically indicated, cannot preserve life or whose burdens outweigh possible benefits, even if parents should ask for such treatment [5,10,13,22]. Failure of intensive care is a mainly medical finding [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, treatment options should be discussed with parents. But, there is broad consensus that there is no moral obligation to offer treatments that are not medically indicated, cannot preserve life or whose burdens outweigh possible benefits, even if parents should ask for such treatment [5,10,13,22]. Failure of intensive care is a mainly medical finding [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Several high profile ethical cases have centered around clinicians' decisions not to pursue futile medical care despite parental insistence. 5 This stance has been explicitly supported by British judges. 6 One of the purposes of our articles was to illustrate that there is extraordinarily little evidence available about outcomes or costs.…”
Section: Hugh Macdonald MD Pediatric Critical Care Medical Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%